FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME AGAIN @ THE END OF THE GAME!


[The Computer Expert, Not!]

SAY WHAT?

FACTS

11.21.2002

Central District, California [Re]Public Defender William Harris:

"This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't."

Even if present counsel is competent, a serious breakdown in communications can result in an inadequate defense. United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000) (cert. denied, Musa v. U.S., _______ U.S. _______, 121 S.Ct. 498 ( 2000)). Similarly, a defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970).

Judge Howard Matz

Page 5, Lines 1-2
Judge Howard Matz: “You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose.  It’s either Mr. Harris or yourself.”

Killercop: “I will stand on my paperwork.”

MORE ON THE COVERUP

"In a [complex] computer case where you’ve got all sorts of computer evidence coupled with the problem that the client has technical expertise that the lawyer doesn't, it just compounds the issue."

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ

"I don't mean to minimize what I think you're telling me because I'm in the same boat as you, but I construed you to tell me that you need some kind of tutelage about the niceties of computer technology and Internet usage..." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, in reply to Bill Harris.

ANYONE SEEN MY NICETIES? I HAD THEM BEFORE I ENTERED!!

MAYBE THE GOBLIN ATE IT ALONG WITH THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW?

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

YOUTUBE

NY TIMES

WSJ

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

PLEASE DONATE AT GOFUNDME

All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 1997-2023

THE LAW OF 1 = 2

 

Judge Howard Matz: “You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose.  It’s either Mr. Harris or yourself.

 

WANTED FOR QUESTIONING.

YOU TELL ME IF IT WAS THE MI$$ING EXPERT$ OR THE GOBLIN WHO STOLE THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW. DO NOT FAIL TO COMPLY!!!

BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME TWICE.

BIG BROTHER WAS WATCHING, BUT NOT HARD ENOUGH!! AND LORD MATZ DIDN'T GIVE A RATS ASS ABOUT DUE PROCESS OR WHAT GOT LOST.

WHILE KILLERCOP WAS IMPRISONED, THESE FILES WERE LOST BY THE PUBLIC PRETENDER AFTER SOMEONE STOLE THEM ENROUTE, WITHIN THE B.O.P

THEN THE LOCAL BOP ATTORNEY NAMED A. RODELL, WITHIN THE B.O.P, TRIED TO GET ME TO BREAK THE LAW BY ANTE-DATING A DOCUMENT. NUTS!!

WILLIAM HARRIS, A HAND PICKED ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENSE; BY JUDGE MATZ AND DEBRA WONG YANG, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE.

  1. DON'T FORGET MY ZIPS!!

  2. OR THE HARD-DRIVES.

  3. JUDGE HOWARD MATZ WILL GET BAFFLED AND DISTURBED AGAIN!!

WATCH AN ACT OF "AGONY," OVER, AND AFTER, THE FACT.

 

BUT THEY STILL IGNORED THE FACTS, THEN BROKE THE RULES, THE LAW, AND VIOLATED DUE PROCESS, INTER ALIA, WILLFULLY AND WITH "SPECIFIC" INTENT.

 

YOU LIKE AGONY???? YOU GONNA GET IT THEN, U.S. WHEN YOU LEAST EXPECT IT!

COPORATE PRISONS

 

10.21.2003

Page 22, Lines 3-6
Judge: “I have read carefully every response that has gotten to "us" and I’m satisfied and I’m making a finding that all of your contentions about lost, destroyed, unaccounted-for evidence are unfounded.”


Saavedra: “Excuse me, Your Honor, Killercop is correct. They did send him a 100-Megabyte ZIP. Now, stating that his are 250, he is correct. He won’t read it.

Judge: “How long have you known that the Zip disk has not been useable by Killercop?”

Saavedra: “When he told me that a couple of weeks ago.

He didn’t even have a ZIP disk. And of the evidence that I was sent in to MDC, there was not one ZIP disk anywhere.

Accused: “That’s correct.”

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

THIS PREMIUM, 25 YEAR OLD DOMAIN NAME, ALL RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA AND ALL OF IT'S CONTENTS ARE FOR SALE, SEPERATELY OR ALL AT ONCE, IN ONE EASY BID!

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES BIDS.