FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

CAN YOU HEAR ME?

TRAINING IS OVER... TIME TO SEE WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED!

THE CASE OF A COY GAME.

Judge A. Howard Matz

 

"And I'm digressing from the reading of the transcript to note that on more than one occasion, in my presence, Killercop, in my view, played a very coy, manipulative game of refusing to waive his right to counsel, while at the same time refusing to allow the court to appoint counsel in his behalf." ~ Judge Howard Matz

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

BUT THEN AGAIN, IN HIS VIEW IT'S ALL ABOUT HIM ANYHOW.

 

DIED FOR THE LIBERTY TO SPEAK

NOTE THAT THE "REFUSAL" NEVER STOPPED THE FOISTING OR THE FORCING BY MATZ.

 

Judge A. Howard Matz

JUDGE MATZ: "Well, I am letting you speak. It's important to me that I let you speak as well as, I think, in most respects your right to speak.

If you had said to me judge, I want to be my own lawyer, I would have spent a half hour explaining to you why that would be an absolutely mistaken decision on your part.

I could take you through all the different little and big aspects of fighting off the government at the trial and before the trial in this case, that you 'need' a lawyer to handle."

 

SMELL NO ODOR

 

KILLERCOP: "I'm very aware of that, Your ODOR."

 

Judge A. Howard Matz


JUDGE MATZ: "If you are not seeking to represent yourself you're making a wise decision."

Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ:

on the record.

"THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT I'M TELLING YOU THAT IF YOU WANT TO BE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, I WOULD HONOR THAT CHOICE, AND IF YOU WANT TO REPRESENT YOURSELF, I WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HONOR THAT CHOICE SO PLEASE TELL ME WHAT YOUR PREFERENCE IS." ~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

"If a defendant persists in his choice to represent himself, that choice must be honored even if it is to his own detriment." Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834.

 

ONCE UPON A TIME ALONG CAME AN UNLAWFULLY FORCED ATTORNEY, NAMED GREGORY. HIS JOB WAS TO PLAY STUPID, ALLOW HIMSELF TO BE FORCED ON ME BY MATZ, THEREBY TAKING OVER THE SUBPOENA OF GARY WINNICK, FROM THE PREVIOUS INCOMPETENT ATTORNEY, WILLIAM "WILD BILL" HARRIS.

 

GREG THEN LATER CUTS IN LINE, QUITS, THEN HE "RELEASES" GARY WINNICK; AFTER THE FACT, TO THE PROSECUTOR, WHEN HE COULD NO LONGER PLAY "THE FORCED GAME."

 

THE PROSECUTOR THEN "RELEASES" GARY TO LORD MATZ, WHEN SHE COULD NO LONGER PLAY "THE SECRET FORCED GAME," EITHER. MATZ THEN "RELEASES" GARY WINNICK!!

 

GARY WINNICK

'CAUSE THEY KNEW I SURE WAS NOT GOING TO RELEASE HIM!!

THEY HAD NO AUTHORITY TO DO THAT, EITHER.

 

ARE YOU GETTING ALL THIS DOWN...?

 

NO MISTAKES THIS TIME, OKAY?

 

SELECTIVE ARRESTS AND PROSECUTIONS IS CENSORSHIP

 

Make no mistake. I am dead serious! And I am armed, again!! So keep your dogs at bay. Bring back [my lawfully subpoenaed prisoner,] Gary Winnick! I demand a new trial!!

GARY WINNICK

I had him under a lawful subpoena until the tag team by Matz, Greg and his sweetheart Debra.

 

Now the tag team is Matz, Debra and their good buddy Kozinski.

 

Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ

" There's one other thing, before you ask your question, before I forget. There is a subpoena that apparently has been served on Gary Winnick."

NOTE: AS IN LAWFULLY SERVED.

Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ

" I notice that Gary Winnick is not identified on the government's witness list. And I assume, correct me if I'm wrong, that the government has the ability to communicate with Mr. Winnick or with his lawyer; is that correct?"

A WOMAN OF ABILITY

ELENA J. DUARTE:

 

"I have that ability, Your Honor."


Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ

 

"I want you to communicate to the lawyer or to Mr. Winnick or to both, that although he doesn't have to respond to the subpoena on the date or under the terms that it may have contained, he remains responsible to respond on whatever date he is later notified.


In effect, what I'm saying is that the subpoena, although it was issued and served through the auspices of Mr. Harris, 'it's like a court subpoena.

 

I don't want anybody to have to go through any protracted or new ground of efforts to subpoena him anew. "

 

"So the subpoena remains outstanding, although the trial date has been continued. Please communicate that to Mr. Winnick and his lawyer."

A MAD MAN SPEAKS FROM THE GRAVE

ACTUALLY, IT'S NOT THE WAY I SEE IT, IT IS THE WAY THE LAW SEES IT.

YOU JUST WENT TOO FAST, FOR ONCE, AND SKIPPED OVER CONDUCTING A HEARING, ACCORDING TO Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), TO DETERMINE WHETHER I SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO WAIVE MY RIGHT TO COUNSEL.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

"The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees that a Citizen brought to trial in federal court “must be afforded the right to the assistance of counsel before he can be validly convicted and punished by imprisonment.” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 807. A criminal defendant may waive the right to counsel and represent himself. Id. at 819-20.

 

AND THAT'S MY SHORT FRIEND IS A FACT.

AND YOU VIOLATED MY RIGHTS.

BUT YOU KNEW YOU HAD TO DO IT, IN SECRET.

 

"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.

STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

CENSORED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ.

'Cause I say So, Only!

 

A.K.A. "'WILL YOU LET ME' APPOINT A LAWYER FOR YOU????"

 

The following takes place Monday, 8.27.2003

Los Angeles, California

Judge A. Howard Matz

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS::

 

"All right. I have arranged for your presence today through my courtroom deputy because I told him, the deputy, to arrange, "in the usual and ordinary course," to have a lawyer selected from the indigent defense panel to serve in the standby capacity that I've just explained to KILLERCOP. You are that individual. And I will allow KILLERCOP and you to determine to what extent, if any, Killercop wishes to communicate with you at points where he seeks the assistance of "standby" counsel in his own self-defense Now, do you want to be heard...?"

YOUNG KC

KILLERCOP:

"Yes, Your Honor. Thank you very much. I'd like know, on the record, the court's authority to foist further counsel upon me after it's failed to protect and do its duty to protect my rights by making an inquiry into previous counsel when they were violating my rights.

 

I'd like the record to clearly reflect -- where is your authority coming from to foist somebody else upon me?

What statute, what law? God?

Please put something on the record."

 

Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ:

on the record.

"Okay. That's something you can look into in your own self-defense, but there's no issue and no question that I have the authority. "

"I am not going to debate the law with you, Killercop; I'm not going to trot out law books."

 

"But I'm telling you I have the authority, and now I've exercised the authority."

 

YOUNG KC

KILLERCOP:

"Thank you very much, Your Honor. I appreciate that, but that didn't answer my question. And I'm just asking you [to do your job and inform me where in the law you have the authority --]"

 

Judge A. Howard Matz

INTERUPTION BY A. HOWARD MATZ:

"Okay. Now, Killercop, I'm telling you now that henceforth -- and I've had to tell you this in the past when I've responded to some -- something I've permitted you to say or you've chosen to say, and you don't like the answer -- I am not going to involve myself, and I'm not going to permit you to try to create a circumstance where there is some kind of protracted argument or discussion, no matter how civil the voices may be, no matter how hard each of us may try to be. That's not my function, and that's not your right. So if you don't like my answer, that's just too bad. Now, is there anything else you want to add that is different?"

YOUNG KC

KILLERCOP:

"Well, yes. I appreciate that, Your Honor. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to respond. But you haven't answered my question."

 

Judge A. Howard Matz

A. HOWARD MATZ

"Okay. If you continue to assert that in the form of an objection [I'll have to kill you], because at this point you are representing yourself, so the objection is overruled."

 

YOUNG KC

KILLERCOP:

"Ummmmm, So at this point you are just making things up! That was not an "objection," it was a direct challenge requiring an answer under the law.

 

 

There is and remains "both the issue and the question of the authority." Both unanswered.

 

So actually, and to date factually, under the law, and now on the record, you didn't and don't have that authority.

Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes. and you are breaking the law!

 

Let the record reflect he willfully refused to answer the question of the issue of the law and authority."

 

FOOT NOTES:

NOTE: Elena and Debra were making things up too! It's easy. Watch.

 

Until I got tagged. And then sand-bagged.

 

Did you know the F.B.I. don't make things up, ever. They don't investigate either, if you believe them.

 

But they do make bitchin' PowerPoint Presentations full of whoppers!

 

Speaking of Whoppers, is it lunch? Email me and we can do lunch at McDonalds. I'll have my usual, I am tired of all the Whoppers, I want a Big Mac!

 

 

The manner in which the courts ordinarily interpret criminal statutes is fully consistent with this ordinary English usage. That is to say courts ordinarily read a phrase in a criminal statute that introduces the elements of a crime with the word "knowingly" as applying that word to each element. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 79, 115 S.Ct. 464, 130 L.Ed.2d 372 (1994) (STEVENS, J., concurring). For example, in Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985), this Court interpreted a federal food stamp statute that said, "`whoever knowingly uses, transfers, acquires, alters, or possesses coupons or authorization cards in any manner not authorized by [law]'" is subject to imprisonment. Id., at 420, n. 1, 105 S.Ct. 2084. The question was whether the word "knowingly" applied to the phrase "in any manner not authorized by [law]." Id., at 423, 105 S.Ct. 2084. The Court held that it did, id., at 433, 105 S.Ct. 2084, despite the legal cliche "ignorance of the law is no excuse."

 

 

A. Howard Matz (born 1943) is an American attorney and judge.

He has sat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California since 1998.

Birth Place :Brooklyn, New York Date Of Birth, 1943

A. Howard Matz Photo Collection

Matz, A Howard reference * Short Description * United States federal judge

Comment * A. Howard Matz (born 1943) is an American lawyer and judge. He has sat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California since 1998.

Label * Howard Matz

Howard Matz

Category: Judges of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Category: United States district court judges appointed by Bill Clinton

Category: 1943 births * Category: Living people

Given name Alvin Howard

Name * A. Howard Matz, A Howard Matz

Matz, A. Howard

Born 1943 in Brooklyn, NY

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Central District of California. Nominated by William J. Clinton on October 20, 1997, to a seat vacated by Harry L. Hupp; Confirmed by the Senate on June 26, 1998, and received commission on June 29, 1998.

Education:
Columbia University, A.B., 1965
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1968

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Morris E. Lasker, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 1969-1970
Private practice, New York City, 1970-1972
Private practice, Los Angeles, CA, 1972-1974
Assistant U.S. attorney, Central District of California, 1974-1978
Chief, Special Prosecutions Unit, 1977-1978
Private practice, Los Angeles, CA, 1979-1998

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

 

.

 

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI.

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.