FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

KILLERCOP BEGGED THE JUDGE NOT TO LET THEM QUIT!

Judge Matz

Judge A. Howard Matz:

Ms. Bednarski, are you telling me in plain language that the communications between your office or any member of your office [of the Federal Public Defenders, Central District of California] on the one hand and Killercop on the other hand have been so impaired that the ability to maintain mutual trust and respect and confidence in each other’s respective obligations and positions has been shattered?"

 

YES! BEST OF FRIENDS!

F.P.D. Bednarski: “Yes!

 

Judge Matz

Judge:Is that the result of things that were said by one side or the other side in this existing attorney-client relationship?

 

YES! BEST OF FRIENDS!

Bednarski: “In part.

 

JUST THE FACTS

"Take note of Justice O’Connor’s remarks in 2001 that prompted the New York Times to editorialize that the “legal "representation" afforded most indigent defendants...” is woefully inadequate. See Editorial, Justice O’Connor on Executions, N.Y. Times, July 5, 2001, at A16.

A WISE GUY

Take bigger note of the change from the original word of "assistance" to the different word of "re-presentation."

 

FBI COINTEL PLAN BY AGENTS TO DIVIDE UNITED STATES WITH HATE AND LIES

 

That is how criminals change a "Right" into an "Entitlement." And speech into conduct.

 

Then both are gone, forever and disappear. And where no becomes a yes. When that happens to you, America...

 

SECRET CONFLICTS

 

Everage is appealing the verdict. Tuesday's secret hearing centered concerned the public defender assigned to Everage's case. Everage's new lawyer believes the public defender may have had a conflict of interest in the case, and maybe shouldn't have represented him in the first place. The new lawyer needed the courts permission to question the public defender about it. All of this was done behind closed doors, allowed in the courtroom.

If Everage's new lawyer proves a conflict of interest with the public defender, Everage could eventually get a new trial.

 

Woe Unto Thee...And That's A Fact!


"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.

STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

CENSORED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

JUDGE MATZ, MEET YOUR HAND PICKED ATTORNEY. HE WILL DO A BANK UP JOB FOR YOU! TRUST ME.

ANOTHER SELECTIVE PROSECUTION OF KILLERCOP

 

A.K.A. A GANG RAPE BY A WOMAN!

 

ASSISTED BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE AND FURTHER HELD DOWN BY A PANEL OF ADDITIONAL MEN.

 

THEN THE RITUAL BEGAN.

 

CASE LAW: FARETTA, RULE 43, THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE & CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS, OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

 

THAT'S A FACT.

 

AROUND HERE I CALL THEM THE FEDERAL PUBLIC PRETENDERS. JUDGE MATZ HATES THAT FORM OF THE FREEDOM OF THE SPEECH...AND WANTS TO DO NOTHING MORE THEN SUPRESS YOURS, TOO!

 

TO HIM NO MEANS YES!

 

EXAMPLE: NO REPRESENTATION MEANS YES! FORCED REPRESENTATION...UMMMM, I MEAN ASSISTANCE!!

 

Judge A. Howard Matz, Criminal

 

 

 

UMMMMMMM, THEN I GUESS THE "CAPACITY" WOULD BE UNLAWFUL FOR YOU, OR ANY FEDERAL AGENT, TO SUPRESS ANY SPEECH OF ANY CITIZEN. ESPECIALLY MINE. BUT YOU AND I KNOW YOU CAN DO OTHER UNLAWFUL STUFF INSTEAD, UNDER THE COLOR OF THE LAW.

 

BUT ONLY AS LONG AS YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES CAN COVER IT UP. WITH THE HELP I AM SURE OF THE LIARS WITHIN THE F.B.I.


INTENT OF THE MIND

KILLERCOP: "And now, four weeks before trial, they [the Public Defender's Office] appear incompetent to proceed with..., they bring this motion claiming that an actual conflict now exists which is peculiar, unusual, and quite distinct. Their words.

 

To the extent that my court-appointed public defenders has failed to perform their jobs as that has created a difficulty in their proceeding to trial as ordered by this Court -- I've already pointed out the problems of this Court with no relief -- to grant this request would be to further jeopardize my right to a speedy trial, representation, and/or assistance to competent counsel and right to my freedom."

 

NO!!

Judge A. Howard Matz:

GRANTED!

 

NEXT UP: WILLIAM HARRIS, ESQ

 

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

 

.

 

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI.

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.