FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

A FRAUD AND TREASON UPON THE COURT, BY AN ASSUMPTION OF THE JURISDICTION, THROUGH AN INFERENCE AND FALSE CONFESSION. ALL FOR THE POWER TO SHUT THE INTERNET DOWN!!

FOR THE RECORD:

2022

"I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING." " NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL."

I, KILLERCOP, AFFIRM UNDER PAIN AND PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE DOCUMENT ON THE RIGHT IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY AND CAN PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL, IF DEMANDED LEGALLY, LAWFULLY AND POLITELY. SO KEEP YOUR DOGS AT BAY! I AM ARMED, AGAIN. BELIEVE IT!

YOU CAN CATCH A DEAD FISH WITH ANY JURISDICTIONAL HOOK.

A "jurisdictional hook" is a "'provision in a federal statute that requires the government to establish specific facts justifying the exercise of federal jurisdiction in connection with any individual application of the statute.'" United States v. McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 471 (3d Cir. 1999)), overruled on other grounds by Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), as recognized in United States v. McCalla, 545 F.3d 750, 756 (9th Cir. 2008).

Similarly, in United States v. Killercop, we held that an identical jurisdictional hook in 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) was satisfied where the "[d]efendant electronically sent threats and social
security numbers
to internet servers located across state lines." 505 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir. 2007).

In that case, the government presented evidence that the defendant's website,
which contained the threats, was uploaded to various servers located in multiple states.


SEXUALLY AROUSED ANIMAL

 

"If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because my role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of the truth."

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

YOUTUBE

NY TIMES

WSJ

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

PLEASE DONATE AT GOFUNDME

All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 1997-2023

BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL WORDS OF THE EMAIL SENT TO SUNG PARK, ESQ, COUNSEL OF THE RECORD OF THE STATE.

 

Sent:                               Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:35 PM

To:                                   Sung B. Park

Subject:                          RE: IMPORTANT: jurisdiction

 

SHOW ME WHERE YOU BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT PROVED I TRANSMITTED ANY PAGE ESTABLISHED THROUGH A NETWORK LOG FILE.

IN ALL THE CASES CITED THE ACCUSED ADMITTED TRANSMITTING.

THE GOVERNMENT WAS NEVER PUT TO THE CRUCIBLE OF PROVING IT.

I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING.

 

[SINCERELY,

 

KILLERCOP]


RIGHT AFTER THE RIGGED HEARING, BY JUDGE MATZ' BUDDY, ALEX KOZINSKI, SUNG PARK ANNOUNCED HE "QUIT," IN THE PARKING LOT, DUMPED BOXES FROM HIS TRUNK AND ANOUNCED HE WAS GOING TO WORK FOR MR. BONNER AT HOMELAND SECURITY. AHHH JUDGE MATZ' OL' TAG TEAM WAS ALIVE AND STILL KICKING.

 

ALL I HAVE LEFT IS RESTORATION, OR CONFRONTATION, AMERICA.

MY INTERPERTATION THIS TIME,

NOT THEIRS,

OR YOURS.

See the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution.

SELECTIVE PROSECUTION

(“Interpretation of a word or phrase depends
upon reading the whole statutory text, considering the purpose and context of the statute, and consulting any precedents or authorities that inform the analysis.”); Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 615 (2001) (“Words that have acquired a specialized meaning in the legal context must be accorded their legal meaning.”). Absent a more specific statutory definition, “[j]udicial jurisdiction implies the power to hear and determine a cause . . . .” United States v. O’Grady, 89 U.S. 641, 647 (1874).

 

LIKE A GOD AMONGST MERE MORTALS!

 

"He's just a victim," said Roslawati, 30, as tears streamed from both eyes. "He didn't post that video ..." Like many Indonesians, she uses just one name.

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

THIS PREMIUM, 25 YEAR OLD DOMAIN NAME, ALL RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA AND ALL OF IT'S CONTENTS ARE FOR SALE, SEPERATELY OR ALL AT ONCE, IN ONE EASY BID!

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES BIDS.