"I would like the record to reflect that I don't like being yelled at by Your Honor."

 

TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTRY, AMERICA

 

Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM

Page 18, Lines 13-25

Judge Matz: “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case.

I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all.

So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”

ASK EXPERTS

WELL THAT'S DANDY, THEN!!

SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE!

LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, WOULD THEY ACCEPT THAT AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS?

BY THE WAY, I NEVER FOUND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK OR YA JUST DON'T CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?

BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE INCOMPETENT TO COVER UP YOUR CRIME.

MORE ON MATZ HERE: AND HERE: AND HERE AND EVEN HERE

Judge A. Howard Matz, Criminal

"I can't ever be sure whether what I say to somebody is going to be
comprehensible to that person, but the bottom line on this particular inquiry concerning Mr. Reed's status is finished." ~JUDGE MATZ, November 7, 2003, PRETRIAL OF KILLERCOP


Transcript of 11.18. 2003; 8:40 A.M. Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM

 

KILLERCOP: She was being evasive.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: She just told us all that she was the one in charge after getting that delegation. Now, I'm not going to permit more inquiry into that. That's out of the question. Nobody has the right to establish something that's been established and to go over it time and time again. No one has the right, not any lawyer, not any client, to impeach somebody about something that hasn't been inconsistent.


KILLERCOP: Okay.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: That's been established.


KILLERCOP: >I would like the record to reflect that I don't like being yelled at by Your Honor.


JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: It's true, I raised my voice and I shouldn't have.

 

KILLERCOP: I'm trying to be respectful, as you have asked me. I'm also trying to show Your Honor that this witness became, I believe, very good friends with the agent --
Cugno
-- on a personal level.


HUMOR:

 

Defendant (after being sentenced to 90 days in jail): Can I address the court?

 

Judge: Of course.

Defendant: If I called you a son of a bitch, what would you do?

 

Judge: I'ed hold you in contempt and assess an additional five days in jail.

 

Defendant: What if I thought you were a son of a bitch?

 

Judge: I cant do anything about that. Theres no law against thinking.

 

Defendant: In that case, I think you're a son of a bitch.

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

Judge A. Howard Matz has a Harvard Degree In Verbal Know Nothingism.

And That's A Fact.

 

ASK EXPERTS

10.21.2003

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Okay. Well, I'm going to deny the motions. They are frivolous anyway, so I will issue an order in that regard."

Killercop: "It was your court-appointed attorney that filed them, created them as frivolous."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "I wouldn't say they're frivolous --"

Killercop: "You said they are frivolous."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "That's really overstating it."

No, Howard, actually this is what overstating something looks like in reality.

Now where is the CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW that you, Greg, Elena and Debra Yang hid from We The People?


11.14.2003

Judge A. Howard Matz: "it would be a huge sea change in the administration of justice to have the personal backgrounds of 'whoever' happens to be U.S. Attorney at a given time become a basis to issue subpoenas.

Selective prosecution, which you 'hinted' at, has already been ruled upon. So I don’t need further argument on Ms. Yang."


GAME OVER

Can you guess why Yang and Nicolayson and Dr. Who were treated like royalty by Lord Matz, and forgiven by Lord Kozinski?

 

Here is a big hint for all you detectives, from the Board Of Governors.

 

MATZ AND CO

Prof. John C. Coffee, Ronald J. Nessim, Howard Matz , Robert S. Fink and Michael J. Madigan

 

Need another hint?

 

Okay.

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

DISCLAIMER

FAQ

CONTEXT

REWARDS

CONTACT

Copyright 1997-2022

All Rights Reserved.