 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING, WOULD YOU RATHER I KICK YOU IN THE TEETH, OR IN THE HEAD? JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. I'm going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice. Ladies and gentlemen [of the jury], "we" all know that "anything is possible." The question calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question.
NO QUESTION. DONE DEAL. GAME OVER. MIND MADE UP. NO APPEAL. I AM JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER.
"But either way, you're going to trial, unless you decided that there's an alternative thing you want to do, and I'm hoping you won't, which is plead guilty." ~Judge Howard Matz, Pretrial of Killercop. 01.14.2003
A.K.A. DOUBLE SPEAK, A.K.A. THE CASE OF A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE IS A WONDERFUL THING!! MATZ KNEW I WAS NOT GUILTY! A defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970). MATZ KNEW I.T. IS COMPLEX SERIOUSLY COMPLEX
SO... >"[And] in the year 2010 we're still trying to figure out if you've got a lawyer that's going to be okay for you the way you see it. That's not going to happen because at some point I have the power and "the obligation" to find that you have waived your right to have a lawyer re-present you. And then you're going to trial on your own. BUT EITHER WAY, you're going to trial!" ~Judge A Howard Matz, 01.14.2003 Pretrial of Killercop.
HE MEANS "ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN" BECAUSE, ATTORNEYS ARE TOO AFRAID, OR CORRUPTED, OF HIS GOOD BUDDY IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT, AND HIS OTHER POLITICAL FRIENDS WILL PROTECT HIM FROM ANY JUSTICE. AS ALWAYS, HE IS WRONG.
THE POWER OF A SUGGESTION CAN CHANGE THE COURSE OF OUR HISTORY. NINTH CIRCUIT TAKES A PUNT!
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
Copyright 1997-2023 |
"I'M CERTAINLY NOT MAKING ANY FINDINGS." A.K.A. THE CASE OF A
JUDGE MATZ: "OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE REASON I'M ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS IS, IS THAT IF I -- IF I WERE TO TELL YOU -- AND, AGAIN, THIS IS -- I GUESS HAS TO BE A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION --BUT THE BREAKDOWN OF COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN KILLERCOP AND HIS PRIOR THREE ATTORNEYS, AS WELL AS MR. NICOLAYSEN -- AND BY, BREAKDOWN, I DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SAW THIS MORNING."
A. "HMM-HMM."
Q: "DIRECTLY FOLLOWED DISCUSSIONS OF PLEADING GUILTY, AND WHAT KILLERCOP WOULD HAVE TO DO AND HAVE TO ADMIT TO IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE CASE, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT, PERHAPS, KILLERCOP SIMPLY GETS VERY, VERY ANGRY TO THE POINT WHERE HE REFUSES TO CONTROL HIMSELF, AND INSTEAD, EXPRESSES HIS ANGER WHEN HE'S CONFRONTED WITH THE FACT THAT IT'S MAYBE TIME TO EITHER SETTLE THE CASE OR GET READY FOR TRIAL?"
MR. NICOLAYSEN: "YOUR ODOR, PERMIT ME. I DON'T MEAN TO OBJECT IN THIS TYPE OF PROCEEDING, BUT I DON'T WANT THE RECORD TO SUGGEST THAT THE ASSUMPTION IS, IN FACT, CORRECT."
THE COURT: "YES. I DON'T THINK THE RECORD DOES SUGGEST THAT. I DON'T CONSTRUE IT TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION. I DON'T HAVE ANY ASSUMPTION, AND I'M CERTAINLY NOT MAKING ANY FINDINGS." "BUT I THINK THE WAY TO REALLY GET THE QUESTION FRAMED IN A WAY THAT I THINK WOULD ASSIST ME, IS TO ASK IT THIS WAY, DOCTOR, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT'S AN INHERENT FUNCTION OF A
THE WITNESS: I THINK BASED ON WHAT I SAW TODAY, YES.
THE COURT: IF YOU SAW THIS WOULD IT CHANGE YOUR MIND? THE WITNESS: BASED ON THAT? SURE!!
A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION FOR RANDY, KEITH OR KATHY. WOULD IT BE BETTER TO SHOOT JUDGE MATZ, FROM TEN YARDS AWAY, IN THE HEAD OR IN THE FOOT HE LOVES TO PUT INTO HIS MOUTH? I WASN''T SURE, SO I BROUGHT DYNAMITE, JUST IN CASE!
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
