 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"The "Applicable Standards" to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition..." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, pretrial of Killercop
"If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)."
The court shall [THEN] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant."
"Due Process of law is the right of the Citizen affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law." Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 500.
“May I inquire AS AN ESQUIRE of HIZZZ ODER, whether or not the court is planning to make any "Factual findings" in regard to the "reasonable cause standard" under the statute since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?”
THIS IS THE SAME JUDGE IN CHARGE OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF YOUR CHILDREN, AMERICA.
"Right now I don’t think this case is ready for trial and MUCH of the reason is not immediately attributable to you. Some of it is not attributable to you at all. All of this mysterious confusion about what happened to the evidence..." Page 55, Lines 4-16. 09.26.2003, Pretrial of Killercop.
A.K.A. The Little Chamber of Horrors
Los Angeles County lawyers agreed last week to guidelines intended to end a children’s mental-health-care system that critics say subjected young people to horrors far worse than what they would have faced had they simply been left alone. In the settlement of In re Katie A., accepted by U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz, the county agreed to try to provide decent mental-health services to children in their own homes whenever possible. County workers had allegedly identified children needing mental-health services and removed them from their families, often placing them in foster care or group homes where they faced physical and mental abuse — and still never got mental-health services. An advisory board will oversee the settlement. But many advocates were left unsatisfied, including the attorney whose 2001 state-court suit paved the way for the later class action. Sanford Jossen noted that no deadlines have been given. He said advisory-board members would be paid thousands of dollars for their work, “but the kids get nothing.”
Don't feel so bad, Sanford Jossen , I got nothing either.
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
Copyright 1997-2023 |
A CASE OF THE FACTS AND A FINDING UNDER THE LAW. A.K.A. IGNORE THE PERSONS BEHIND THE CURTAIN! A.K.A. Alas, The Moment is Past.
AN UNLAWFUL STAR CHAMBER. COME ON, CONSPIRE TO FEEL THE AGONY!!!
"Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --"
HAVING REVIEWED THAT, WE ACTUALLY ARE OF THE OPINION -- AND I'LL TAKE AS MUCH RESPONSIBILITY AS I NEED TO FOR THIS -- THAT THE ORDER THAT WAS SUBMIITED AND SIGNED ON MARCH 20TH, IS A LITTLE BIT OF A HYBRID, AND IT NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED. IN THAT, IF IT'S GOING TO BE A 4241(D) COMMITMENT, IT APPEARS THAT THE COURT DOES NEED TO MAKE A FINDING ...
"The reason I didn't want to make that finding and declined to make that finding was primarily because I didn't want to inflame him...not because I had any doubts about applying the applicable standards to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition.” ~JUDGE HOWARD MATZ
THE CASE OF "THEN" IS PAST "If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)."
The court shall [NOW] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant.
MY "THEN" CONDITION? ARE YOU BAFFLED, AGAIN? IF YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BAD "THEN", YOU OUGHT TO SEE IT NOW! NOW AS IN "PRESENTLY." ARE YOU FOLLOWING ALONG WITH ME HERE? NO? WELL SNAP OUT OF IT. IT IS VITAL YOU FOCUS ON THE TRUTH! AND MAKE IT PROMPLY! 'CAUSE SOMEONE IS ABOUT TO DIE. JUST ASK GARY WINNICK. IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO. OH, THAT'S RIGHT, WE CAN'T, 'CAUSE ALL THREE OF YOU UNLAWFULLY RELEASED HIM. WELL, THEN TELL HIM TO KEEP HIS DOGS AT BAY, AGAIN. AND THAT GOES DOUBLE FOR THE FERAL, FEDERAL DOGS! BUNCH OF FRAUDS!
YOU WANT TO GET INTO MY MIND??? WELL, SINCE YOU "HAVE TO LOOK."
LOOK AT THIS. BUT DON'T LOOK AT THAT. OR READ THE LAW. WORDS DON'T MATTER ANYMORE. AND NO PROBABLY, I REPEAT, NO PROBABLY ABOUT IT. YOU JUST WITNESSED A THOUGHT CRIME. IT WOULD BE PRUDENT OF YOU TO ERASE YOUR HARD-DRIVE AND TURN YOURSELF INTO THE PROPER-AUTHORITIES.
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
