NO "VITAL" CERTIFICATE
THIS MEANS THE ENTIRE [DUE] PROCESS STOPS AND JURISDICTION IS LOST (STOLEN) AND THE TRIAL WAS UNLAWFUL AND ILLEGAL.
08.27.2003
JUDGE MATZ SAYS. NO CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW FOR YOU!
The reason
I didn’t want to make that finding and declined FAILED to make that finding was
primarily because I didn’t want to inflame him; not because I had any doubts about applying the applicable standards to what I perceived to be his 'then'
condition.”
Transcript of 03.14 2003

Page 62, Line 12-15
Judge: “Do I first have to find he’s
not competent?” Or can I also find that there is sufficient questions as to
whether he’s competent to require that?”

Page 69:
Lines 14-15
Defendant: “I
challenge the jurisdiction
of this court. This examination is unlawful.”

Page 73:
“Lines 7-10
Doctor Ihle
of the BOP: “But given that it’s a 4241(D), it does guarantee that it will go
to the Medical Center, because
it goes under the umbrella of treatment;”

Page 76,
Lines 14-20
Judge: “It’s
for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed four months.”

Prosecutor:
“So I was just asking for our
status on this commitment - - on the eval, within the four months, or at the end
of the four months, …

Judge: “Well, that four months is for treatment.”

Prosecutor:
“Okay.”

Page 76,
Lines 24-25
Judge: “So if
you prepare an order that says he’s going to transferred to Rochester
for treatment 4241(D)…”

Page 77,
Lines 8-9
Nicolaysen: “I concur. The four months, as I read the statute
is for the evaluation and treatment.”

Page 79,
Lines 17-19
Prosecutor:
“Your Honor, I will also submit this order on a disk.”

Judge: “Yes.
Because I may ‘fiddle’
with it.

See ORDER RE:
FURTHER COMPETENCY DETERMINATION, filed March 20, 2003: page 4, lines 8-11
“In addition,
the Court finds that the ‘ends of justice’
served by taking the action of requiring such examination
and continuing the trial date accordingly outweigh the best interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy
trial…”
Transcript of 08.22.2002
Page 5,
Lines19-23
Judge: “Was
there any issue concerning his competency to prepare for trial and
stand trial and his capacity to cooperate and assist his own lawyers?”
Potashner: “
Your Honor, at this point I do not see a competency issue.”
See April
7, 2003, SECRET HEARING

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
|