I want to assure the court. We agonized over this.
COME, FEEL THE AGONY!!! AN UNLAWFUL STAR CHAMBER.
GREG Nicolaysen:
"THANK YOU SO MUCH. YOUR HONOR, GOVERNMENT COUNSEL TRACKS MY THINKING AS WELL.
I WANT TO ASSURE THE COURT. WE AGONIZED OVER THIS. WE SPENT WELL OVER AN HOUR ON THE PHONE FRIDAY. SPOKE AGAIN ON SATURDAY...
ANTICIPATING THAT YOUR HONOR MAY VERY WELL WANT SOME FEEDBACK ON THIS VERY POINT, SO WE'RE NOT TRYING TO PUT WORDS INTO THE COURT'S MOUTH BY ASKING YOU TO MAKE A FINDING [OF A FACT] THAT YOU DIDN'T MAKE; HOWEVER --"
ELENA J. DUARTE:
HAVING REVIEWED THAT, WE ACTUALLY ARE OF THE
OPINION -- AND I'LL TAKE AS MUCH RESPONSIBILITY AS I NEED TO FOR
THIS --
THAT THE ORDER THAT WAS SUBMIITED AND SIGNED ON MARCH
20TH, IS A LIITLE BIT OF A "HYBRID," AND IT NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED.
IN THAT, IF IT'S GOING TO BE A 4241(D) COMMITMENT, IT
APPEARS THAT THE COURT DOES DID NEED TO MAKE A FINDING ... [OF A FACT]
"The reason I didn't want to make that finding and declined to make that finding was primarily because I didn't want to inflame him...not because I had any doubts about applying the applicable standards to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition.” ~JUDGE HOWARD MATZ
MY "THEN" CONDITION?
HOW ABOUT YOU STAY IN THE PRESENT? AS IN, THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE REQUIRES AN ACCUSED TO BE "PRESENT" AGAINST HIS ACCUSORS. AND SO DOES THE LAW. TRY READING IT.
You don't even have to be there to be judged and examined and "found;" pardon the expression, incompetent."
Wish they could have found a law book instead. Maybe then they would have read it. Or did they? I guess we shall have to "agonize" over whether they did or did not, and whether my presense was necessary, under the law, "probably."
But then again, that's probably not good enough.
NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET:
MORE DENIAL OF A RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF THE CRIME.
INFORMATION!
HOW "NOVEL" AN IDEA
CONTACT KILLERCOP IF YOU CAN. PROMPTLY!!
IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO.
"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
"What would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP
Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.
STILL BAFFFLED?
WIKI
WOUNDED WIKI
CENSORED WIKI
FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER
YOUTUBE |
Commitments after a judicial finding of inCompetency.
"Upon a judicial determination of reasonable cause to believe the
defendant is incompetent, the court may order a 30 day in-patient examination under 18
U.S.C. §4241(b) and 18 U.S.C. §4247(b).
The court cannot begin with a four month
commitment under §4241(d) without this intermediary step." U.S. v. White, 887 F.2d 705,
710 (6th Cir. 1989).
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
A SECRET FROM THE KEY OF THE KNOWLEDGE
SAY WHAT?
THE FOLLOWING UNLAWFUL HEARING TAKES PLACE ON 04.07.2003 IN A DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT.
Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen."
Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --"
Doctor Phil Says: Anything Coming Out Of The Mouth After "However," Negates Everything Before That Word.
Just Keeping It Real.
FOR THE RECORD
"people need not be present in the room, or even the same state, before THEY 'find them' incompetent" AND to be "sent off" for a mental "treatment."
MOREOVER, said treatment may begin at anytime, before the finding of a fact!"
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
Copyright 1997-2022
THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.
EMAIL KILLERCOP
Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.
|
 |
