Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.
I call this this case, belo' me, Lord of the Rom.
Meet . the most corrupted judge in America
THE SUPREMES ARE OF THE OPINION THAT 1028(a) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
IN CASE YOU'RE LATE TO THE SHOW, THATS THE LAW KILLERCOP WAS CHARGED UNDER, INTER ALIA. BUT THE GOV SCREWED THAT ONE UP BIG TIME.
" Federal trial judges are forbidden to instruct on jury nullification, because they are required to instruct only on the law which applies to a case . As I have indicated to you, the burden in each instance which is here placed upon the Government is to prove each element of the offenses ... beyond a reasonable doubt, and in the event the Government fails to sustain its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to any essential element of any offense charged against each defendant, it has then failed in its burden of proof as to such defendant and that defendant is to be acquitted. In short, if the Government proves its case against any defendant, you should convict that defendant. If it fails to prove its case against any defendant you must acquit that defendant."
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department called for the release of two convicted former state lawmakers in Alaska
because of prosecutorial errors , in a new after it dropped charges against former U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens. embarrassment for the department
Former Alaska state Reps. Peter Kott and Victor Kohring, both Republicans, were convicted in 2007 on bribery and extortion-related charges. Mr. Kott was sentenced to six years in prison and Mr. Kohring received a 3½-year term.
Attorney General Eric Holder said a
review of the two cases showed that prosecutors failed to provide information that should have been disclosed to the defense. The same type of error doomed the Justice Department in the Stevens case, which followed a years-long probe of the powerful Republican senator from Alaska.
IN THE BLACK AND WHITE
Interstate Thought Crime 18 U.S.C.A. 875(c)
END TRANSMISSION IN BLACK AND WHITE:
Why the switch by Matz from "Whoever transmits, to "Whoever makes,?"
BLACK AND WHITE, BOTTOM-LINE:
Matz knew the government had
no proof of a at the end of transmits or a transfer, the trial-in-name-only, so . he changed the words of the law
rewrote the law." And hid the Nature.
He does things like that in his Secret Chamber...in his Mystical Realm of the Ninth. Killercop calls it a Star Chamber.
"instruction" to the jury con-structively and structurely amended the indictment, when he again changed the " " nature of the crime.
He violated not only the
letter of the law, but the " spirit of the law." Not to mention due process, his oath, and his own honor.
didn't matter to him at this point, he was on a roll of corruption and ignoring the law.
Seriously, this still stands today as he refuses to correct it. So does this federal subpoena.
Did I mention I have a CD-ROM? But like the law, it is worthless, unless you are rich and powerful, corrupted and unjust. But that's our little secret. Right, gang? Did you not meet my gang?
IF YOU CAN.
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" - Judge A. Howard Matz , PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like " pretty clear?" Because I'm " pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.
I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...
you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!
"another person" and "the person of another.
Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!
In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!
Meet Judge Elena J. Duarte.
The Honorable Elena Duarte, a Sacramento County Superior Court Judge, was a wonderful keynote speaker. She spoke about the and told some importance of community service touching personal anecdotes - such as how her father, a criminal defense attorney, used to joke that his daughter "turned out bad" because she worked as a federal prosecutor.
MS. DUARTE: SO, YOUR HONOR, WHAT WE SEE IS THERE MAY BE A AN ESCALATION. "PASSIVE" THREAT ON THE WEBSITE AT FIRST, JUST AS THERE WAS IN THE CASE OF THE LAPD OFFICERS.
BUT THEN WE ESCALATE TO AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR. SO, I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT IT IS NOT AT ALL A LONG SHOT TO SAY THAT THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR, ALTHOUGH PASSIVE, MAY
Listen to Elena's lies to the Wizard of Koz, about Killercop's wife's testimony. Then compare Elena's lie, to the official court transcript.
Do you see anything therein about, " posting daily?" How about just "posting??? " How about Transferred?
"element" of the law says " transmits." But then again, no one involved was following the law. Or even reading it. Except me. And that is a fact.
But not now.
The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act defines judicial misconduct as “conduct
prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 351(a)
NOTE FROM THE OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIPT:
What is it?
A It's a computer and a tower and a chair in my bedroom.
Q Whose computer is this?
A Killer' s.
OKAY, THIS MEANS THE GOVERNMENT HAS TOTAL CONTOL OF MY PROPERTY, ALONG WITH MY FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.
THIS ALSO MEANS THEY HAVE THE NIC WITH THE MAC. THESE ARE COMPLEX TERMS.
11.08.2004 (Pgs 8-9)
JUDGE MATZ: "I think you need to be
real careful in how
you use some of these ." terms
Ummmmm, do you think Judge A. Howard Matz means "real" as opposed to fake careful? Like pretending to care about Mr. Sutcliffe's fundamental rights. Or your property.
SEE ANYTHING ABOVE ABOUT "POSTING" "TRANSFER" OR "TRANSMIT" YET? I DIDN'T THINK SO...
A showing of constitutional error under the Sixth Amendment only merits grant of the petition for habeas corpus if the
error was not harmless, that is, if it had a “ substantial and
injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict .”
Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 638 (1993).
HOP IN THE WAYBACK MACHINE AND LET'S GO BACKWARDS IN TIME TO THE TRIAL OF KILLERCOP AND LISTEN FOR THE SECRET WORD IN THE LAW CALLED "TRANSMIT," AT THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS.
OPPPS, NOT THERE! JUDGE A.HOWARD MATZ CHANGED THE WORDS, AGAIN.
Influence in determining the jury’s verdict. Using his words AK.A. for the ammo. AK.A. Listen carefully.
Judge Matz: "Before you proceed any further, please listen , carefully members of . the jury
The witness has identified the picture as depicting Killercop's rifle. Killercop is arising out of his not accused of committing any crime possession of any weapon or ammunition.
may consider evidence of his possession
of deciding whether the
government has met its burden of proving that , in if killercop the communications that have been
alleged in this case , or caused to be made , made those communications, he acted
with a making specific intent to threaten the persons who were the
subject of these communications.
You'll be required to apply that limiting
It's the kind of
limiting instruction --
tell you, , but only for the limited purpose I just told you." you are allowed to take into account this evidence of
the rifle and of any evidence that there may be about
ammunition or other firearms
WAS THAT A LIMIT? OR AN OPENING!!
What Matz really said:
I can change the very words of the law. There is no limit to my power! "Before you proceed any further, please but fail to notice how I just listen carefully, changed gears there, with the rifle, just to scare and mislead you. By doing that I was able to change the very words of the law!! This kind of power, will be shown in the coming afterbirth of the Sutcliffe Opinion we are creating.
Being a federal judge, I know that the Supreme Court has made very few rulings regarding the admission of evidence as a violation of due process.
Although that Court has been clear that a writ should be issued when constitutional errors have rendered the trial fundamentally unfair, see Williams, 529 U.S. at 375, it has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ. Absent such “' clearly' established Federal law,” nobody can conclude that my ruling was an “unreasonable application.” Muhahahaha! Am I a great tyrant or what?
Also, fail to notice that there is of 18 USC no element 875(c) about "' '" the communication. making' or 'made
I just "made" that up. I'm a judge who is crooked. It's what I do. I just make stuff up as I go along, to ensure my wealthy friends stay out of hot water with these guys.
I did that because we talked behind your back in secret, and we noticed that we heard the Government's expert talk about "make" or "made" pages, on the computer they seized. But the Government's expert never said anything about what the law actually says and requires. Which is, 'whoever transmits... '
The accused would have argued this point, but I denied him any experts, and effective assistance of counsel. And since you know nothing of the secret hearing, or about the missing doctor, I will proceed as normal.
Now, jury, do my bidding, in the name of the law and the children. Even if that is not what the law says it says.
Harvard trained, and educated, and you are stupid drones to do my bidding, and the bidding of my masters.
Now go follow those crooked and corrupted jury instructions!" I am appointed for life and I am immune to justice!! Muhahahahaha! Opppps. Gotta run.
Kozinski Court held that the district court of judge A. Howard Matz did abuse its discretion by allowing the Government to present evidence of the defendant's gun possession to demonstrate that he actually intended to threaten violence. Id. at 959.
But decided to cover it up, too.
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - ' Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about ' contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!