FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

Judge Matz and conduct unbecoming an officer of the court. A.K.A. The case of one step forward. Two steps back.

 

GOBLINS?

"The behavior that neither resulted in a conviction nor even an arrest but that was facially unlawful, and in any event a very chilling indication of the consideration as to how likely it is that he would commit further crimes is that he undoubtedly and indisputably set up this killercop.com web site; tried to arrest via citizen's arrest a law enforcement officer carrying out 'his' duties in a courthouse; the indication that his wife has made, I'm not making any findings but it's in the record, and it resulted in an issuance of a domestic restraining order in New Hampshire that he was prone to violence or at least she claimed; and the demeanor that she displayed when she testified at the trial I find to be not only consistent with that but probably the result of that.

It was a demeanor combining both profound fear and embarrassment as well as enmity."

~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, DURING ILLEGAL SENTENCING HEARING OF KILLERCOP

 

GOBLINS?

"Now I want to tell you something. What is in your interest is to get this case ready for trial. And to start the trial not one day too soon. And if at all possible, not one day too late. You're going back over the ground about detention and I don't blame you because I haven't had to be a prisoner [yet] but I know what it's like one step removed and it's awful.

 

You want to get out of that situation." ~Judge A. Howard Matz to Killercop

 

FACTS

Six months alone, or more, was caused by his secret hearing."

 

BUT FIRST HE HAD TO VIOLATE THE SIXTH AMENDMENT.

IT APPEARED VITAL HE THEN CONTINUE.

BECAUSE OF THE "HYBRID" ORDER.


ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

YOUTUBE

NY TIMES

WSJ

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

PLEASE DONATE AT GOFUNDME

All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 1997-2023

Codes Of Conduct A.K.A. The unbecoming of an officer.


GOBLINS?


The real question is what comes next, Killercop? And what comes next is preparation for trial.

And what comes after that is trial.

Now if you are relying on and if your lawyers are relying on outside experts to assist in any aspect of the defense, and it wouldn't surprise me if they have to, given the nature of these charges.

And in the time necessary, because nobody in this situation is in a position to focus all of her time or all of his time only on your defense. All of us have other obligations. I have other trials, I have other defendants who have a right to a speedy trial.


But I will guarantee you that I will set this down for trial and stick to the date, unless there are absolutely
compelling conflicts that I can't get out of, to get you to trial as quickly as possible. ~Judge Howard Matz, 08.22.2002.

FACT: The trial was delayed by him for over a year more. Are you baffled, too?

Canon 1: A judge should uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. ("Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility.") Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law and should comply with this Code. Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law.

Canon 2: A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities. ("A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. A judge must therefore accept restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly.")

A. Respect for Law.

A. judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment. A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.

C. Nondiscriminatory Membership. A judge should not hold membership in any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin.

Canon 3: A judge should perform the duties of the office impartially and diligently. ("A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party ... ")

Canon 4: A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities to improve the law, the legal system and the administration of justice. ("A judge, subject to the proper performance of judicial duties, may engage in ... law-related activities, if in doing so the judge does not cast reasonable doubt on the capacity to decide impartially any issue that may come before the judge.")

Canon 5: A judge should regulate extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial duties. ("Complete separation of a judge from extrajudicial activities is neither possible nor wise; a judge should not be isolated from the society in which the judge lives. The changing nature of some organizations and of their relationship to the law makes it necessary for a judge regularly to reexamine the activities of each organization with which the judge is affiliated to determine if it is proper for the judge to continue the judge's relationship with it. For example, in many jurisdictions charitable hospitals are now more frequently in court than in the past.")

Canon 6: A judge should regularly file reports of compensation received for law-related and extrajudicial activities. ("A judge may receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the law-related and extra-judicial activities permitted by this Code, if the source of such payments does not give the appearance of influencing the judge in the judge's judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety...").

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

THIS PREMIUM, 25 YEAR OLD DOMAIN NAME, ALL RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA AND ALL OF IT'S CONTENTS ARE FOR SALE, SEPERATELY OR ALL AT ONCE, IN ONE EASY BID!

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES BIDS.