IS IT POSSIBLE?

SOMEONE BETTER LET THE EX-SECRETARY OF DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES KNOW RIGHT AWAY! IT WOULD BE PRUDENT!! UNLESS, OF COURSE, HE IS JOE SCHMOE!

 

 

"The exact nature of the allegations facing Assange aren't clear, although Stephens has in the past described them as a part of "a post-facto dispute over consensual, but unprotected sex.""

"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP

Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.

STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

CENSORED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

Anything is possible in Judge Matz's SECRET court, except justice.

Probably.

"Only the most egregious misconduct, such as bribery of a judge or members of a jury, or the fabrication of evidence by a party in which an attorney is implicated, will constitute a fraud on the court"). Additionally, fraud upon the court differs from fraud on an adverse party in that it "is limited to fraud which seriously affects the integrity of the normal process of adjudication." Gleason v. Jandrucko, 860 F.2d 556, 559 (2d Cir. 1998).

JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. I'm going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice. Ladies and gentlemen [of the jury], "we" all know that "anything is possible."

 

The question calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question.

 

Do I have to reframe your question? Or you'll have to explore that in another stage of the lawsuit, Killercop. Anything is possible."

 

KILLERCOP: "Okay."

JUDGE MATZ: "So questions about whether something is possible are not "ordinarily" appropriate. In fact, they are ordinarily not appropriate."

Unless one has a captive audience.

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

 

.

 

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI.

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.