“We cannot let colorblindness become myopia which masks the reality that "many" created equal" have been treated within our lifetimes as inferior both by the law and by their fellow citizens.” ~William J. Brennan, Jr.


>The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights said the department's reversal in the case indicates that its Civil Rights Division is failing to protect white voters and is "at war with its core mission of guaranteeing equal protection [under] the laws for all Americans.''

License to Kill Black Men!

We now see a pattern of law emerging, from both the state and federal courts that grant police departments across the nation, a license to kill black men. In virtually every case that has made its way before the court involving the killing of unarmed black men by police officers, the court has found legal precedent to justify such killings. The publice record demonstrates that not one police officer in America has been convicted of killing an unarmed black man. In one of the most egregious cases, New York Police Officers shot an unarmed black man fifty (50) times. Every officer involved in this shooting of Sean Bell was exonerated by a court.




News of the Weird: LAPD all clean.

Look Again.

LAPD Provides Disappointing Response to Racial Profiling Report.

"Jurors unanimously concluded the officers had “Deliberately falsified” information in the warrant affidavit and that their conduct had been “outrageous,” according to court records.

the First Amendment

“The dominant purpose of the First Amendment was to prohibit the widespread practice of government suppression of embarrassing information. ~William Orville Douglas

What the LAPD did and continues to do is criminal

"What the LAPD did and continues to do is criminal," Hill said in an interview Monday after the verdict. "There's a code of silence. . . "


You would have to be "incompetent" not to agree. No?


At least our reports are certified!

Due Process crimes HERE, HERE, HERE and more HERE.

"Current federal hate crimes law permits the federal prosecution of a hate crime only if the hate crime was motivated by bias based on race, color, religion, or national origin and the assailant intends to prevent the victim from exercising a "federally protected right" such as Speech."

But that is another of the lies and disinformation, since the federal government no longer recognizes any "rights" they are sworn to protect, just entitlements. And they covered up the State crimes witnessed by the state, county and local government.

But they will prosecute you for speech crimes,

But they will prosecute you for speech crimes, even if they have not a shred of evidence to prove jurisdiction.

nothing lawful coming from there

I know. Let's ask the judge. Nope, nothing lawful coming from there. How about the Appeal's judge? Nope, nothing lawful there, either.

Bill of the Entitlements.

How can the Chief Justice forget 35 words written in the country's constitution? Because he forgot the Bill of the Rights, too. They secretly substituted them with a Bill of the Entitlements.

Back when I was on the receiving end of racial discrimination, it was to me not simply a personal misfortune, or even the misfortune of a race, it was a moral outrage. But not everyone who went through such an experience sees it that way.

When it comes to subjecting other people to the same treatment in a later era, some have no real problem with that. They see it as pay-back.

One of the many problems of the pay-back approach is that many of the people who most deserve retribution are no longer alive. You can take symbolic revenge on people who look like them but this removes the whole moral element. If it is all right to discriminate today against individuals who have done you no harm, then why was it wrong to discriminate against you in the past?

These are not just abstract questions. These are serious, real world questions.

Some judicial nominees have had racial bias attributed to them, despite their years of unwavering support of civil rights for all-- Judge Robert Bork and Judge Charles Pickering being striking examples. But the current Supreme Court nominee is the first in decades to explicitly introduce racial differences in their own words, along with the claim that their own racial or ethnic background makes them better qualified.

Attempts to claim that Judge Sonia Sotomayor's words were isolated remarks-- a slip of the tongue "taken out of context"-- have now been discredited by further information showing that she has repeatedly expressed the same ideas, in virtually the same words, at other times and in other contexts.

Moreover, her deeds-- including years of participation in group identity politics-- are perfectly consistent with her words. So too was her vote on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to summarily dismiss the appeal of white firefighters who did not get the promotions they had earned by passing a required test, because not enough minority firefighters passed to provide racial "diversity."

The Supreme Court of the United States found that appeal worth hearing, even if Judge Sotomayor did not.

The warm and genial image of Sonia Sotomayor presented on television, during President Obama's introduction and afterwards, is in sharp contrast with what attorneys who have appeared before her in court have said.

A poll of such attorneys showed them rating her worse than other judges in her treatment of those who appeared before her. A tape of Judge Sotomayor's abusive behavior in court backed up the attorneys' picture. It is also consistent with someone in pay-back mode.

A confirmation decision on a Supreme Court nominee is not like deciding whether someone is innocent or guilty of a crime. It is right in criminal cases that the burden of proof is on those making an accusation, and that the accusation be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Judge Sotomayor is not in jeopardy of either criminal or civil penalties. So there is no reason why either the criminal standard or proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" or the civil standard of "the preponderance of evidence" is required for determining whether she is the right person to be given a lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land.

It is hundreds of millions of Americans-- current and future-- whose fundamental rights are at stake whenever any nominee is being considered for the Supreme Court of the United States. It is the American people as a whole who are entitled to the benefit of the doubt.

One of those fundamental rights was taken away just four years ago, when a 5 to 4 decision by the Supreme Court gave local politicians the right to seize your home or business and turn the property over to some other private party that they favor. Just one vote on the Supreme Court can make a huge difference.

We have been told endlessly about Sonia Sotomayor's biography and her symbolism as a Hispanic woman. Is that enough to risk millions of other Americans' fundamental rights?

There is no room in our society for these acts of prejudice

"There is no room in our society for these acts of prejudice," said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. "Hate crimes fragment and isolate our communities. They tear at our collective spirit."

"The Senate made a strong statement this evening that hate crimes have no place in America,"

Some 45 states have hate crime statutes, and investigations and prosecutions would remain mainly in state and local hands.

The federal government can step in after the Justice Department certifies that a state does not have jurisdiction or is unable to carry out justice.

"will provide police and sheriff's departments with the tools and resources they need to ensure that entire communities are not terrorized by hate violence."

Opponents of the bill, including conservative religious groups, argued that it infringes on states' rights and could intimidate free speech.

Supporters countered that prosecutions under the bill can occur only when bodily injury is involved, and no minister or protester could be targeted for expressing opposition to homosexuality, even if their statements are followed by another person committing a violent action.

To emphasize the point, the Senate passed provisions restating that the bill does not prohibit constitutionally protected speech and that free speech is guaranteed unless it is intended to plan or prepare for an act of violence.

The FBI receives reports of nearly 8,000 hate crimes each year. Of those, about 15 percent are linked to sexual orientation, which ranks third after those involving race and religion.

The Senate hate crimes bill is S. 909.

But we are reading this one instead.








"Just because you're a police officer, it doesn't give you the right to use intimidation," Holtgreve said. "I guess if you pay your union dues you can do anything you want."

Tell US What You Think

Now Tell US What You Think ABout Our Previous Email From Cops Across America...In 1998, Below.


"Don't hate the player, hate the game." ~Killercop 2010


FBI Selectively Arrests Man For Online Threat Against Indicted BART Cop.

Mehserle's father contacted the FBI on January 8 saying he'd found the threats against his son online. FBI agents subpoenaed Jones, who runs InfoWars, to obtain IP addresses from which the messages were posted. They matched three addresses to a Verizon account owned by Weaver.


"The F.B.I. and D.O.J. will no longer selectively prosecute threats against cops and rich white people only. "

monkey savages

From: "Billy Clough" <slimjimbix@hotmail.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: Interesting...what do you think??

Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 08:32:29 PST

What is wrong with you, you stupid fucking nigger?

And you wonder why you niggers get shot....you mother fuckers are nothing but savages.

Go the fuck back to Africa, with the rest of the monkey savages........\


If not, why not?

Why did Chuck, of the LAPD, allow this hate crime above to go unreported to the F.B.I.? Or did he?

Better question is why did this F.B.I. agent and the Department Of Justice allow the agent to lie to the people they are sworn to serve that "there was never an investigation?"

Did they play cover up for the L.A.P.D.?

Or even worse, did the L.A.P.D. cover up for the F.B.I.?


It's "pretty clear" that the F.B.I. conducted "it's own" investigation.

And the F.B.I. knew how much the cops hated me, so he allowed this to happen.

So why all the lying to the American people?

And what happened to my civil rights?

Then your worthless self will be dead.

Then your worthless self will be dead.

Thu Mar 19 1998 18:49:40 Received: from redrivernet.com (redrivernet.com []) by atlas.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29238 for <killercop@killercop.com>

From: Death from Above <snipe@juno.com>

Reply-To: snipe@juno.com

Organization: Death from above Inc.

Subject: Felling Saucy

The next time you feel bad. Or the next time you feel like killing a cop maybe if the next time you take your sad sorry excuse for a human being you just might find me and few of my freinds at your door...... Then your worthless self will be dead and I will personaly smash your computer after I delete your web page. Is'nt freedom of speech great... XOXO Death from Above

The supreme race does the right thing.

The supreme race does the right thing.

Sat Apr 11 19:57:39 1998 Return-Path: <jdarr@erols.com>Received: from smtp3.erols.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA273 for <killercop@killercop.com>

From: John Darr <jdarr@erols.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

I still don't understand why people whine when the supreme race does the right thing and puts niggers in their place. Somalia was probably the best time of my life. Everyday we got to bust some niggers. Man, a .300 Win Mag opens there head up like a watermelon dropped on the sidewalk. Ah, but not long before we get to do the same thing here.

But shoot straight nigger (yeah right) cause we don't miss. Hope ur enjoying ur collard greens and fried chicken,


You are truley a sick person...

You are truley a sick person...

From: woodroe@modempool.com (Matthew Sherwood) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)MIME-Version: 1.0

To: sutcliffe@killercop.com

Subject: Your web page

You are truley a sick person... You have nothing more to do but bring a bad name to those people who try to protect us from the the people out there who try to do us so much warm...

It would be real easy for someone like you who does not protect us from these people to judge those who do. Maybe instead of trying so hard to promote the killing of these police officers and spend a few of those dollars in a education, maybe you should try to become a police officer and see if your intentions of killing would be the same.

I think you represent the moral decline that troubles this society... How would you feel if we started to kill all owners of cats that go outside and shit on the ground that we walk on.... would you feel threatened by that...

KILLER COPS REPLY:  In answer to the question, in the fiction, of the cats, my only worry and question back for you is this, "Do the "owners" of the cats have the right of the bearing of the Arms in the defense from the killers of the cats? 

If your answer is yes, I would have no problem with killing the owners of cats. Let them fend for themselves like the rest of the counrty.  Lord knows the cops won't help them...they're too busy shooting unarmed people and cats!!

i hope some cops kid fucks your mother

i hope some cops kid fucks your mother

Tue Mar 31 21:12:58 1998 Return-Path: <C2O2P3@aol.com> Received: from imo13.mx.aol.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA363 for <killercop@killercop.com>;

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: up your ass

you are were you deserve to be........i wish you come to my city you piece of garbage.....i dont eat donuts and dont beat people just for fun ....however with you i can make a reason to change this......if you were inocent you would be out .....if there was no evidence you would be out .......you have a 12 gauge ......i have my handsand i wouldn't even use my gun ...i just beat the shit out of you with my hands.......later you piece of shit.....i hope some cops kid fucks your mother then your old lady gives them aids so they can die slow ...then he fucks your sister and they have a kid..who then runs into you one day and blows you the fuck away ......

we will all know who or what you were

welcome to new york

Tue Mar 31 18:11:46 1998 Return-Path: <greyrider@hvi.net> Received: from hvis1.hvi.net ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA231 for <killercop@killercop.com>;

From: "b" <greyrider@hvi.net>

To: <killercop@killercop.com>

Subject: invitation to the dance

welcome to new york - where we dont like people who advocate the killing of police officers - i see that you dont have any sponsors or ads on your site - nice - and as soon as the trace comes back we will all know who or what you were - have fun with your idea that backfired in hindsight.

I can take a .45 Glock and put 10 rounds into you

I can take a .45 Glock and put 10 rounds into you

Wed Apr 01 07:07:58 1998 Return-Path: <hinec@ccgate.dl.nec.com> Received: from Telemann.inoc.dl.nec.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA259 for <killercop@killercop.com>;

From: cory hine <hinec@ccgate.dl.nec.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com


I'll make you a bet. I'll bet that if you come to DFW in Texas, that I can take a .45 Glock and put 10 rounds into you, and no one in Texas will indict me...... Since I can't go through the secured area armed, please advise what flight you will be on, and what you'll be wearing. Then we'll see.....

You now have a bounty on your head.

A Bounty

Tue Mar 31 18:11:53 1998 Return-Path: <no_mystery@hotmail.com>Received: from hotmail.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with SMTP id AAA259 for <killercop@killercop.com>; Originating-IP: []

From: "I.M.A. Mystery" <no_mystery@hotmail.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: A Threat

You now have a bounty on your head.

Thanks for the laughs

Thanks for the laughs

Tue Mar 31 17:34:56 1998Return-Path: <NascarDEE3@aol.com>Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA155 for <killercop@killercop.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: Ignorance

My aren't you a piece of work. It appears to me that you were very luck that the only thing you got out of all this was arrested. You are very luck you're located in a liberal state like California. Try this act in the midwest and someone will thump your mostly empty little cocoanut for you. Thanks for the laughs and keep up the good work. By the way, will they let you maintain your website for the joint?

Crawling up your ass with a microscope

Crawling up your ass with a microscope

Sat Apr 11 12:49:26 1998 Return-Path: <SergtRock@aol.com>Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA242 for <killercop@killercop.com>

From: SergtRock <SergtRock@aol.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: You Are A Joke

Can't believe you let thos big bad female cops haul you in. <snicker> If you were half the man you think you are, you would have handled the situation then & there. You are a first class coward. Be assured we know who you are & are crawling up your ass with a microscope.

See you soon.

Maybe some day I will get to level my glock at you....

Maybe some day I will get to level my glock at you....

Mon Apr 06 19:18:02 1998 Return-Path: <JCoburn235@aol.com> Received: from imo27.mx.aol.com ([]) by diane.netcbc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA93 for <killercop@killercop.com>

From: JCoburn235 <JCoburn235@aol.com>

To: killercop@killercop.com

Subject: killacop

go fuck your mother in her goat ass, maybe some day I will get to level my glock at you....








Copyright 1997-2022

All Rights Reserved.