FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

08.22.2002
PRETRIAL OF KILLERCOP

Page 20, Lines 16-19
Judge Matz: “If you had said to me judge, I want to be my own lawyer, I would have spent a half hour explaining to you why that would be an absolutely mistaken decision on your part.”

 

Page 20, Lines 24-25
Judge Matz: “If you are not seeking to represent yourself you’re making a wise decision.”

 

Page 26, Lines 18-23
Judge Matz: “But I will guarantee you that I will set this down for trial and stick to the date, unless there are absolutely compelling conflicts that I can’t get out of, to get you to trial as quickly as possible. But I don’t want you to start the trial before you’re ready. That means your lawyers are ready. And that means the experts are lined up.

 

Forced Reality Treatment

DUE PROCESS? TRY NO PROCESS!

 

A. Necessity of Services

[1] Upon a timely request by an indigent defendant, "[t]he statute requires the district judge to authorize [expert] defense services . . . in circumstances in which a reasonable attorney would engage such services for a client having the independent financial means to pay for them." United States v. Bass,
477 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1973). The court's inquiry into the necessity of services must be specific to the facts of the particular case. See, e.g., United States v. Armstrong, 621 F.2d 951, 956 (9th Cir. 1980).

 

ASK THE EXPERT

Pre-Trial Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM U.S. -v- Killercop.

Page 18, Lines 13-25 Judge A. Howard Matz:

"I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case.

 

I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all.

So I think you could have somebody who has never seen a computer but is a fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view."

ASK EXPERTS

WELL THAT'S DANDY THEN!! SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE

LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS AND BUDDIES IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, WOULD THEY ACCEPT THAT AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS?

BY THE WAY, I NEVER FOUND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK OR YA JUST DON'T CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?

BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE STUPID TO COVERUP A CRIME.

JUST FOR THE RECORD YOU WERE CERTAINLY STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE YOU COULD FORCE ANOTHER MAN ON ME, BASED ONLY ON "CAUSE I SAY SO," AS YOUR JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY, INSTEAD OF A LAW, WHEN IT WAS DEMANDED OF YOU. YOU NEVER OFFERED ANYTHING THAT EVEN LOOKED LIKE A LAW. IN FACT, YOU DIDN'T EVEN OFFER A NOVEL THEORY FOR ANY AUTHORITY TO FORCE THIS MAN ON ME. BUT I SEE YOUR GOOD FRIEND, LORD ALEX KOZINSKI, TOOK THE OPPOSITE APPROACH.


Richter v. Hickman, No. 06-15614 (8-10-09)(en banc). In an en banc decision, the 9th (Reinhardt writing) granted petition's writ for IAC. The case turned on circumstantial and forensic evidence. Despite this, defense counsel failed to conduct any forensic investigation.

He decided on a defense without ...without consulting any experts. If he had, expert testimony would have helped support his version of the events, and would have enabled defense counsel to cross effectively, and present his own experts and evidence.

CAN YOU ASSIT ME?

Can you help? To overturn this?

Or are you just another Public Pretender From The Central District Of California?

I really don't trust them.


 

"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.

STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

CENSORED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

ANYONE SEEN AN EXPERT?

 

HOW ABOUT A PICTURE OF ONE THEN?

 

A.K.A. HOW 'BOUT DATA OR FACTS? A.K.A. THE CASE OF THIS DOES NOT COMPUTE!

 

JUST THE FACTS

 

Judge Howard Matz Denies Killercop Any Expert Witnesses In A "Complex Computer Case" Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes. Zero, Zilch! Zip!

 

Under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1), “[c]ounsel for a person who is financially unable to obtain . . . expert . . . services necessary for adequate representation may request them.” After conducting an inquiry in an ex parte proceeding, if the court finds “that the services are necessary and that the person is financially unable to obtain them, the court . . . shall authorize counsel to obtain the services.”

 

[1] Upon a timely request by an indigent defendant, “[t]he statute requires the district judge to authorize [expert] defense services . . . in circumstances in which a reasonable attorney would engage such services for a client having the independent financial means to pay for them.” United States v. Bass, 477 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1973).

Goblins? He is nutz

Yet, at the trial, not an expert to be seen on the side of the accused, but several for the government. Matz knew this and allowed them to remain missing throughout the trial.

 

HERE IS A COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDED DEFENSE'S EXPERT REPORT.

 

The trial judge never bothered to Certify the opinion of one of the government's other so-called expert witnesses. A man by the name of Dr. Who?


How well would you fare if denied any expert witnesses in a "complex computer case."

And made to represent yourself.

And everyone claiming they support your rights secretly didn't.

And worse, you wake up to find out the fact is they knew it.

You would have to see a Doctor when they got done with you...or not see one.

Or does that sound insane?


 

Transcript of 08.22.2002

 

"Now if you are relying on and if your lawyers are relying on outside experts to assist in any aspect of the defense, and it wouldn't surprise me if they have to, given the nature of these charges." ~Judge A. Howard Matz:

 

Transcript of 09.26.2003

Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts [fn.1], or at least one expert, I didn't go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?~Judge A. Howard Matz:

Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor."

Judge A. Howard Matz: “Has anybody discussed with you any of Killercop’s prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?

Reed: “No, Your Honor.

Goblins? He is nutz

fn.[1] " DID I SAY THAT OUT LOUD? I HAD BETTER CHECK MYSELF, I FORGOT THE RULES OF LAW." FACTUALLY AND ACTUALLY I APPOINTED NOT ONE, OR TWO, BUT 3 EXPERTS, BUT NO REPORTS EVER FOUND THEIR WAY TO THE DEFENSE...

Goblins? He is nutz

SO DID THE MISSING CERTIFICATE AND MISSING DOCTOR'S REPORT, REQUIRED BY THE LAW GET EATEN BY THE GOBLIN? I MEAN, IT'S NOT LIKE I DIDN'T HAVE ANY NOTICE. THE LAW SAYS IT IS A "VITAL" CERTIFICATE, TOO!!

LIKE A VITAL ORGAN...


David Reed is now Killercop's sixth annointed and second or third foisted attorney. The one before David Reed, number 5, only lasted less then a week, and quit due to a "conflict in his schedule that he forgot all about." His keen, sharp computer like mind, and it's sudden forgetfulness, cost another week of the freedom and liberty.

The fourth one, before this forgetful one, fought along as a government expert, too. Not! He was the government. And he said this...

The third one, well, never mind.

The first two, working in tandum, well, lets just say they had a conflict, too, they didn't want to discuss on the record. That's all I'm gonna say on that, thanks very much. But at least they were somewhat honest about it, even if they kept it to themself. Yet, they kept forcing themselves on the case....curiously.


A FACT

Transcript of 10.21.2003

 

Judge A. Howard Matz: “Now, Mr. Reed, one of the items that Killercop has filed seems to suggest that he has never received any investigative reports or any witness statements. "

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Among the material that you received from prior counsel that you and Mr. Nicolaysen put together for delivery to MDC, do you recall whether any investigative reports prepared by anybody acting on behalf of Killercop? You don’t have to say who did it.

Reed: “On behalf of Killercop - -

Judge A. Howard Matz: “Yeah.

Reed:No.


Expert Torture

But the Chief of the Ninth knows the importance of experts.

That much is pretty clear.

Can you say Selective Prosecution?

Don't think it didn't happen.

It happens.

It's political.

See?

And that's a fact!

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

 

.

 

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI.

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.