 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
GENERALLY SPEAKING "The VERY powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common, APART FROM A LACK OF COMMON SENSE. Instead of altering their views AND OPINIONS to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."
THE EVIL GOBLINS OF THE WORLD USE SUBTLE "SUGGESTIONS." OR PLAIN OL' DISINFORMATION. THEY ONLY FOOL THEMSELVES." WHILE TRYING TO FOOL OTHERS. ~KILLERCOP 2010
KILLERCOP: " She said she would meet with me the following week to discuss this matter further. As with all of Ms. Potashner's promises, she failed to keep her promise to meet with me the following week or to provide details of the secret investigation she and the public defender's office allegedly had conducted of the torture.
JUDGE MATZ: "Killercop has the right to counsel, although, as
with all rights to counsel, that can be waived, by conduct, or by choice. He had the right to testify; he had the right to
HAD AS IN PAST-TENSE.
A REPLY TO HIZZZODER KILLERCOP: "Furthermore, I frankly don't understand why my
presence is needed here today because, as the conduct of the
government, the defense counsel, and this court's own action or
April 7 clearly prove, all of you believe that the accused need
not be present in the courtroom or, for that matter, not A finding of competency is one of a fact, not law." ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? (c)1997-2023 |
CONDUCT UNBECOMING A.K.A. The case of "I Say It Thice, It Must Be True!" "I would like the record to reflect that I don't like being yelled at by Your Honor." ~Killercop to Judge Howard Matz, Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM
JUDGE MATZ: "BUT EVEN IF IT'S ARMED WITH INFORMATION, IF IT'S INFORMATION THAT COULD BE ABUSED, THAT'S A -- I'M NOT QUESTIONING [THAT] THE PEOPLE --" MS. DUARTE: "BUT HE WAS ARMED AS WELL. I MEAN, A RIFLE WAS FOUND IN HIS HOUSE AT THE TIME OF THE WARRANT." JUDGE MATZ: "YES." MS. DUARTE: "I MEAN, I'M NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT
SPEECH. I JUST WANT THE COURT TO BE CLEAR ON THAT." JUDGE MATZ: "NO, NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN THAT THIS "COULD" ESCALATE. AND BELIEVE ME, IF THERE WERE -- "IF" THERE WERE REAL INDICIA OF THAT, THAT I DIDN'T -- YOU KNOW, "IF" THERE WAS ANYTHING ABOUT USING THAT RIFLE, OR ANYTHING IN HIS PAST CONDUCT -- I MEAN, YOU HAVE SOME CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT IT'S NOT -- IT REALLY WOULD NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL, I DON'T THINK, IN AND OF ITSELF CERTAINLY, OF POSING A 'REALISTIC' THREAT OF VIOLENCE. MS. DUARTE: BUT CERTAINLY, YOUR HONOR, THAT IS NOT
PART OF THE 875(C), AND I KNOW THE COURT'S NOT SAYING IT IS.
BUT 875(C)>> DOESN'T EVEN NECESSARILY REQUIRE AN INTENT TO
CARRY OUT OR ANY OF THOSE THINGS. JUDGE MATZ: NO, NO. I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT IT'S AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE AT ALL. ~Pretrial Hearing Of Killercop in 1984, Double Speak.
"'COULD' ESCALATE???? WELL YOU OF ALL PEOPLE WOULD KNOW "IF" SOMETHING IS POSSIBLE."
Questioning at trial, by Killercop: "Is it possible that the price that you are referring to that had some meaning, some hidden meaning, could be referring to the terms and the conditions upon the first page that we looked at, called index.htm, had been violated and that the owner felt that the money owed was for violating the terms of those conditions to enter the website freely?"
JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. I’m going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice. Ladies and gentlemen, we all know that anything is possible. The question calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question."
SO HE THEN THOUGHT ABOUT HOW A NO CAN BE YES, A PERSON OF ANOTHER CAN BE AN ADULT AND A DEFENDANT'S PRESENSE IN NOT NESSESARY IF YOU FORCE UNWANTED 'DEFENSE' COUNSEL ON THEM.
JUDGE MATZ: "In addition, the behavior that Killercop engaged in in connection with this particular series of
charges and his conduct after he was placed in custody suggests that he has a strong view that these charges are
bogus and that his rights and dignity as an individual have
been compromised and invaded wrongfully.
That being the case, and he may be right, it may be these chargeS are never successfully established, there is a reinforced view on his part, at least I find that there is, that he has to and is inclined to take whatever steps he thinks are appropriate or necessary to protect his interest. Those can include further assaults or threats of violence." ~Pretrial Hearing Of Killercop
JUDGE MATZ: "So I reject the notion that this is [pure] speech. It is conduct. It's inherently threatening and there is no basis what so ever to grant that motion to dismiss. The threats were "coupled with links" as to Counts 5 through 9, as the government correctly points out, this is not simply posting information. This is posting information and directing the reader in at least two of the counts the means under which the information could be misused to very great and direct detriment and injury of the victims. I SAY IT THRICE! It's conduct, it's clearly prosecutable and that's the basis for my ruling." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE TRIAL OF KILLERCOP
JUDGE MATZ COULD NOT BE BOTHERED TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR ANY PROOF IN BLACK AND WHITE. THIS CASE WAS GOING TO BE DRAGGED OUT, SLOWLY. BY HIS CONDUCT. AND NEVER AN APPEAL TO BE GRANTED. IT WAS, AS THEY SAY, GETTING "COMPLEX." AND NOT JUST ANY OL' "COMPLEX, BUT THE "MOST COMPLEX" CASE. ALL IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE, OF COURSE. HE WAS GETTING READY TO PRACTICE THE SECRET RITUAL HE LEARNED WHILE HAVING SEX WITH A DONKEY UNDER A BLOOD RED MOON, WHILE HE DANCED THE NIGHT AWAY WITH ASS-SORTED OTHER PERVETS AND GOBLINS. SINCE WE ALL ARE MAKING STUFF UP AS WE GO. TRYING TO PLAY GOD.
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS. (c)1997-2023
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
