"NO CONDITIONS OF BAIL? AT ALL?"

 

"Gee, too bad I wasn't Gary Winnick, a Banker or an Automaker."

 

 

"BAIL'EM OUT!!! ???? Hell, back in 1990, the U.S. Government seized the Mustang Ranch brothel in Nevada for tax evasion and, as required by law, tried to run it. They failed and it closed. Now, we are trusting the economy of our country, our banking system, our auto industry and now our children's health care to the same nit-wits who couldn't make money running a whore house and selling whiskey?!"

 

My excuse is they took away my right to vote, unlawfully, but "what the hell are you thinking?”

 

WHOIS WATCHING YOU?

 

THE U.S. JUST LIED TO YOUR FACE, HOW CAN YOU TRUST AND HAVE FAITH IN THAT?

 

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?


The parties knew that in ruling on defendant's motion for bail the Court must apply the factors set forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3142(g), which favor defendant's release pending trial. See United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989 (9th Cir. 1990); United States v. Motamedi, 767 F.2d 1403
(9th Cir. 1985).

The parties further knew that in applying these factors, the Court must resolve any doubts in favor of
defendant and must place upon the government the burden of
proving defendant's risk of flight by a clear preponderance of the evidence. Id.

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

Bail - The Eighth Amendment Of The Constitution And Accused Rights


04.16.2002

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

CASE NUBER: CR 02-350-AHM

A. HOWARD MATZ, JUDGE PRESIDING


A. Howard Matz, Tyrant, Judge, Jury and Executioner:

So to start with, ... there are no conditions, even if he were to be released under changed circumstances involving a surety that are reasonably likely to assure the safety of people and institutions but individuals really in this community.

I don't know what to make of the allegation of domestic violence. I realize that he told Judge Woehrle that according to what he told you that charge or that complaint by his current wife was withdrawn; is that correct?

PRETENDERS OFFICE

PUBLIC DEFENDER/PRETENDER HILLARY POTASHNER:

"No, that's not correct. What I told Judge Woehrle was that there was information proffered at the preliminary hearing, there was a probation officer who testified that the threat that was supposedly made to his wife was made in a joking manner. There was testimony from what I hear and what I told pretrial, and what I told Judge Woehrle was I not sure of the current status of the restraining order."

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

Are you sure now?

MS. POTASHNER:

No. I still have no idea.

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

That reinforces what I had in mind in incorporating by reference that developed. Even to someone very close to him, a threat of violence was deemed sufficiently real, despite the claim that it was a joke as to warrant the issuance of a TRO, how far she would go under these circumstances here.

 

RAPE SARAH PALIN?

TO JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, "NO IDEA" IS A "REINFORCEMENT" TO BEGIN BABBLING ABOUT STUFF HE HAS NO IDEA ABOUT...

LIKE COMPUTERS, AND CDROMS, AND MAC/NIC ADDRESSES, OR LAW AND DUE PROCESS, OR EVEN FACTS!

 

HE SHOULD JUST ADMIT HE IS TRYING TO THINK... BUT NOTHING HAPPENS!

 

TO LORD MATZ, AND HIS BUDDYS, NO IDEA MEANS MAKE STUFF UP! OR COVER IT UP IN SECRET. WITH HYPERBOLE, OF COURSE!

HYPERBOLE

 

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF MY JURY, THE "CIRCUMSTANCES" WERE A SELECTIVE PROSECUTION, UNDER COLOR OF NO LAWS OR RIGHTS.

 

AND NEVER MIND THE TRO, THAT'S TEMPORARY AND FALSE. WHAT ABOUT THAT SECRET PSR? OR THE SITUATION HE CREATED.

 

 

 

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

DISCLAIMER

FAQ

CONTEXT

REWARDS

CONTACT

Copyright 1997-2022

All Rights Reserved.