 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
SAY WHAT? 09.26.2003 "THE LAW IS 'PRETTY CLEAR,' AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003, Page 50. CASE FILE: US -v- KILLERCOP.COM
Here is something else that is pretty, too. HE DIDN'T FOLLOW THE LAW, 'CAUSE IT IS GONE.
AS IN IT 'COULD'A GONE
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
GOOD MORNING! Fact: U.S. Government Removed Your Rights. Then Secretly Replaces Those Rights With Entitlements, Instead.
Like an old Folger's Coffee commercial from 1959, the U.S. Federal District Court, of the Central District of California, has secretly replaced the Bill Of Rights with a set of the entitlements. You won't hear about them until you or a loved one have been arrested on a federal charge, and by then it is too late. They start foisting and fiddling. These entitlements entitle you to no protection of your funda-mental rights, or from false charges under the color of the law, since it allows the judge to pick and choose which one's he will protect. This allows for nasty secret things to happen in the courtroom, and outside of it afterwards.
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS DOCUMENT? HERE IS A HYBRID! HERE IS ANOTHER SECRET! SOMETHING TELLS ME THE EX SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IS NOT GOING TO ENJOY HIS COFFEE WHEN HE FINDS OUT THE U.S. PROSECUTOR, DEBRA WONG GAVE ME HIS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND OTHER VERY PERSONAL INFORMATION. WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT, YOU ASK? READ ON, YOU HAVE TO... Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
