 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||||
 |
|
|||||||||
|
1028(a)(7) Void STATUS OF THE COLOR OF THE LAW
If no lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Certified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case...we understand totally, but if not for killercop, then do it for the children.
Or I'll trade you a CD ROM. But not these CD ROMS...
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? (c)1997-2023 |
Get this...you don't have to "show any specific person," so you can shop from the field. Okay, shop this.  Held: Section §1028(a) [supposedly] requires the Government to show that the accused knew that the means of identification at issue belonged to another person. Elena and Debra never proved that during the trial. Inter alia. Any good lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Uncertified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case? Maybe we can discuss it over a big Mac. If only Judge Matz had known! But then again, Judge A. Howard Matz is usually wrong in his opinions, especially about Freedoms, Liberty and Speech. And he practices a form of law he calls, "Just 'cause I say so..." Just like the mob. Sounds like Extortion!! Lets ask an Expert.
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS. (c)1997-2023
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
As a general rule, an accomplice may only be liable as a principal or accessory before the fact, for a completed crime; the aid must be given before the crime is committed, but liability as a principal will not attach until after the crime has been committed
