Appreciate the fear of secret trials...On me!! ya got no right! But You're entitled.

NO? BUT I INSIST!! COME IN...IT'S FREE. DON'T WORRY!
YOUR RIGHTS ARE GONNA BE PROTECTED. BUT NOT ALL OF THEM!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
A.K.A. The case of "Who's crazy now?"

A.K.A. FALL ON THE SWORD?
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
WOUNDED WIKI
WSJ
NY TIMES
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
GOFUNDME
(c)1997-2023 |
I know a secret!
Allow me to demonstrate.

Jeremy Bentham over 120 years ago to appreciate the fear of secret trials felt by him, his predecessors and contemporaries. Bentham said:
". . . suppose the proceedings to be completely secret, and the court, on the occasion, to consist of no more than a single judge -- that judge will be at once indolent and arbitrary; how corrupt soever his inclination may be, it will find no check, at any rate no tolerably efficient check, to oppose it. Without publicity, all other checks are insufficient: in comparison of publicity, all other checks are of small account. Recordation, appeal, whatever other institutions might present themselves in the character of checks, would be found to operate rather as cloaks than checks; as cloaks in reality, as checks only in appearance.

There are a number of questions that evaluators
might seek to answer when making a competency determination.
Does the Judge understand the charges?
Does he appreciate the possible penalties? Does he appreciate
the adversarial nature of the courtroom? Can he
discuss legal strategy? Can he behave
appropriately in the courtroom? Can he provide meaningful
testimony in his own defense?
The issue of competence
can arise at any point during criminal proceedings,
and may be initiated by the defense, by the prosecutor,
or by the judge.

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT
CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS.
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
|
 |