Appreciate the fear of secret trials...On me!! ya got no right! But You're entitled.

NO? BUT I INSIST!! COME IN...IT'S FREE. DON'T WORRY!

YOUR RIGHTS ARE GONNA BE PROTECTED. BUT NOT ALL OF THEM!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

A.K.A. The case of "Who's crazy now?"

A.K.A. FALL ON THE SWORD?

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA

REASONABLE DOUBT

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved

I know a secret!

Allow me to demonstrate.

Jeremy Bentham over 120 years ago to appreciate the fear of secret trials felt by him, his predecessors and contemporaries. Bentham said:

". . . suppose the proceedings to be completely secret, and the court, on the occasion, to consist of no more than a single judge -- that judge will be at once indolent and arbitrary; how corrupt soever his inclination may be, it will find no check, at any rate no tolerably efficient check, to oppose it. Without publicity, all other checks are insufficient: in comparison of publicity, all other checks are of small account. Recordation, appeal, whatever other institutions might present themselves in the character of checks, would be found to operate rather as cloaks than checks; as cloaks in reality, as checks only in appearance.

There are a number of questions that evaluators
might seek to answer when making a competency determination. Does the Judge understand the charges? Does he appreciate the possible penalties? Does he appreciate the adversarial nature of the courtroom? Can he
discuss legal strategy? Can he behave appropriately in the courtroom? Can he provide meaningful testimony in his own defense?

The issue of competence can arise at any point during criminal proceedings, and may be initiated by the defense, by the prosecutor, or by the judge.

Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)

CONTACT

COLLECT A BOUNTY

COLLECT A REWARD

FILE A COMPLAINT

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved