FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

HERE WE GO AGAIN, EITHER WAY, WITHOUT READING A THING!

A.K.A. GRAND JURY MISCONDUCT.

"So they had it from several sources that that "was" the requirement."

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL THAT EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

EPIC CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right.

Do you understand?

NO?

ARE YOU STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

FAQ 1 FAQ 2

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

"Okay. I haven't read the transcript, but I can tell you that the motion lacks merit." It's Frivolus!


THE COURT: Grand jury misconduct?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: What's your theory?

THE DEFENDANT: Grand jury misconduct and/or outrageous Government misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, however you want to phrase it, Government misconduct.

THE COURT: What's your theory for that?

THE DEFENDANT: My theory, Your Honor, is that the first year I was incarcerated, everybody was proceeding under a general intent crime. The Government finally superseded the indictment when the defense raised up that this was not a general intent crime, this was a specific intent crime. The Government, on that theory, then, went back t o the grand jury and was supposed t o apprise them that this was no longer a general intent , but a specific intent crime.


I have read the transcript of the hearing of the superseding indictment, and it failed to note any mention of anyone informing the grand jury that this was all of a sudden a specific intent crime. Therefore -- I believe that the Fifth Amendment requires that defendant be convicted only on a charge considered by the grand jury. And I would cite U.S. versus Dubo -- that's spelled D-u-b-o -- 186 F. 3d, 1177, 1179, which is a Ninth Circuit case in 1999 holding that indictments failure to specify mens rea require dismissal, the requirement insuring that defendant is prosecuted, quote, "on the basis of the facts presented to the grand jury." And I would cite U.S. versus Rosi, R-o-s-i, 27 F. 3d, 409, at page 414, which is, again, a Ninth Circuit. I don't believe the grand jury was ever told that this was a specific intent crime. At least I didn't see it in the transcript.


THE COURT: Okay. I haven't read the transcript, but I can tell you that the motion lacks merit.

The superseding indictment contains, as part of its language, the necessary allegation -- whether it can be proven or not, we'll see -- of mens rea, which addresses that case you talked about. Do you want to be heard about the rest of what Killercop said?

ELENA DUARTE

ELENA DUARTE: We oppose the motion, Your Honor. As to the rest of what he said -- I'm sorry. Regarding?


THE COURT: His theory that you had a duty to
specifically say something about --


MS. DUARTE: I don't have the transcript in front of me, but I don't recognize and am not aware of the legal duty he's talking about.

Generally I read the statute and the elements to the grand jury. I then present the indictment. So they had it from several sources that that was the requirement.


THE COURT: I have considered and I reject that
motion, as well, both motions, Killercop.

THOUGHT CRIMES

LOOKS LIKE I AM THE ONLY ONE READING THE LAW, AGAIN.

WELL THEN, SINCE NONE OF THE PLAYA'S ARE READING THE TRANSCRIPTS, OR THE LAW, OR FOLLOWING IT, LET'S SKIP

  1. AND JUMP RIGHT TO THE ILLEGAL SENTENCE.

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.