FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

"Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)

 

EVIL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, Pre-Trial, discussing killercop.com


JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ

"The 'Behavior' that neither resulted in a conviction nor even an arrest but that was facially unlawful, and in any event a very chilling indication of the consideration as to how likely it is that he would commit further crimes is that he undoubtedly and indisputably set up this killercop.com web site." -Judge A. Howard Matz, SENTENCING HEARING OF KILLERCOP, DISCUSSING KILLERCOP.COM

WHEN YOU ANNOY YOUR SECRET POLITICAL ENEMIES IN AMERICA, THEY TORTURE YOU. UNTIL YOU SHOOT THEM.

SECRETS

Since 1982, the American Library Association has sponsored Banned Books Week as a tribute to free speech and open libraries.

Full List

Library Controversy

  1. Censorship in Modern Times
  2. Candide
  3. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  4. Brave New World
  5. 1984
  6. The Catcher in the Rye
  7. Lolita
  8. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
  9. The Anarchist Cookbook
  10. The Satanic Verses
  11. Harry Potter Series



 

ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

WSJ

NY TIMES

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

GOFUNDME

(c)1997-2023

CENSORSHIP SUCKS!

WIKI WIKI WIKI! OY! OY! OY!

Killercop added two lines of text to Judge Matz' bio page on WIKI on March 5th of 2010. One regarding a substitution of 'entitlements' in place of your rights by the U.S. Federal courts, in the Central District of California. The other was a link to an admission by Judge Matz to not following the law, nor correcting the violation of the law.

Judge Matz as you may recall is the trial judge of Killercop. Well, here at killercop.com I call it a "trial in name only."

On April 1st, 2010 someone from 76.91.171.244 comes along and DELETES the links.

THOUGHT CRIMES I'VE COMMITED

I ADDED THEM BACK ON 04.02.2010 AND THE SAME IP ADDRESS CAME BACK, RECENTLY, AND REMOVED THE SPEECH, AGAIN. SO I ADDED PART OF IT BACK.

Then on the 5th, someone at this address 76.250.11.200 deletes me, again. Then on April 7th, 2010 someone from 76.91.171.244 comes along and DELETES the links.

SO I ADDED PART OF IT BACK. JUST THE EXTERNAL LINK THIS TIME.

He came back on the 14th. I came back on the 15th. And so on, and so on...then this guy comes along out of the blue and deletes my link on the 19th, without responding to the issue I presented to him in the comment section; WHY ARE YOU DELETING THE LINK? He claims my link is "vandalism," because I flattered him by copying his username page and has me "blocked" for the moment, so you can't see the external link.

Classic disinformation without responding to the issue and the question posed to him in the first place. WHY ARE YOU DELETING THE LINK?

It is not SPAM. It is simply another voice in the mix speaking truthfully, backed up by facts.

Something Judge Matz ignores.

Will WIKI have the courage and conviction to stand up to these bullies?

Will freedom of speech be suppressed, again?

Stay tuned to find out here.

CENSORSHIP

A QUESTION FOR MY JURY:

WHY IS IT OKAY FOR THE U.S. DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, CORPORATION, TO HAVE A VOICE IN THE "EXTERNAL" SPEECH SECTION OF WIKIPEDIA, BUT NOT YOU OR I, IF "THEY" DECIDE WE MUST BE SILENCED?

RULES AND LAW BE DANMED?

ISSUES WITH OUR SPEECH? AND BY OUR I MEAN ME. SAME THING FOR WE. AND THE GOBLIN.

FACT: JUDGE MATZ HAS HANDED DOWN "SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL SENTENCES.


ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

PLEASE DONATE WITH ZELLE

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS.

(c)1997-2023

All Rights Reserved.