FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME AGAIN!

The drunk is crawling around on all fours under a lamppost one night. A policeman comes along and asks him his business and the drunk decides to explain that he's looking for a lost quarter.

The policeman offers to help and
pretty soon they're both crawling around looking for the coin. After about a half hour of this, the policeman gets fed up and asks, "Are you sure you lost the quarter around here?" "Oh, no," answers the drunk. "I dropped it over in the alley, but
it's too dark to look there"


“[An] attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client.” A Citizen who let's another "re-present" him, instead of "assist" him is a bigger fool."

[The Computer Expert, Not!]

SAY WHAT?

11.21.2002

FACTS

>William Harris: Public Defenders Office, Los Angeles, California, Central District.

"This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't.

>"In a [complex] computer case where you’ve got all sorts of computer evidence coupled with the problem that the client has technical expertise that the lawyer doesn't, it just compounds the issue." ~WILLIAM HARRIS

 MATZ IS WONG, AGAIN

"I don't mean to minimize what I think you're telling me because I'm in the same boat as you, but I construed you to tell me that you need some kind of tutelage about the niceties of computer technology and Internet usage..." ~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, in reply to WILLIAM "WILD BILL" HARRIS, of the Los Angeles, California, Public Defenders Office.

MAD MAN

ANYONE SEEN MY NICETIES? I HAD THEM BEFORE I ENTERED THIS MAD COURT. MAYBE THE GOBLIN ATE THEM, ALONG WITH THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW? THIS IS ALL TOO COMPLEX FOR ME. TOOTALOO!! I MEAN, TUTELAGE!! LIKE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND!!

 

Judge Howard Matz

A.K.A. Forced to sacrifice one constitutionally protected right, solely because another is respected.

Page 5, Lines 1-2
Judge Howard Matz: “You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose.  It’s either Mr. Harris or yourself.”

Killercop: “>I will stand on my paperwork.”

Even if present counsel is competent, a serious breakdown in communications can result in an inadequate defense. United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000).

Similarly, even if a defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970).

JUST THE FACTS, MAM

a. Factors to be considered in ruling upon a motion for appointment of new counsel.

In reviewing a district court's denial of a motion for appointment of new
counsel, the appellate court considers:

(1) the timeliness of the motion,
(2) the adequacy of the court's inquiry into defendant's complaint, and

(3) the extent of the conflict.
United States v. George, 85 F.3d 1433, 1438 (9th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted).

BENCHBOOK ON CRIMINAL PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS.

I bet he knew the law below.

Judge Matz says in federal criminal cases, Rule 51(b) instructs parties how to preserve claims of error: “by informing the court—when [a] ruling … is made or sought—of the action the party wishes the court to take, or the party’s objection to the court’s action and the grounds for that objection.” A party’s failure to preserve a claim ordinarily prevents him from raising it on appeal, but Rule 52(b) recognizes a limited exception for plain errors. “Plain-error review” involves four prongs:

(1) there must be an error or defect that the appellant has not affirmatively waived United States v. Olano, 507 U. S. 725 ;

(2) it must be clear or obvious, see id., at 734;

(3) it must have affected the appellant’s substantial rights, i.e.,affected the outcome of the district court proceedings,” ibid.; and

(4) if the three other prongs are satisfied, the court of appeals has the discretion to remedy the error if it “ ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings,’ ” id., at 736.

 


 

ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

YOUTUBE

NY TIMES

WSJ

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

PLEASE DONATE AT GOFUNDME

All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 1997-2023

THE KILLERCOP.COM STOLEN FILES.

A.K.A. The adequacy of the court's inquiry.

 

 

BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME TWICE.

BIG BROTHER WAS WATCHING, BUT NOT HARD ENOUGH!!

WHILE KILLERCOP WAS IMPRISONED, THESE FILES WERE LOST BY THE PUBLIC PRETENDER AFTER SOMEONE STOLE THEM ENROUTE, WITHIN THE B.O.P

THEN THE LOCAL ATTORNEY NAMED A. RODELL, WITHIN THE B.O.P, TRIED TO GET ME TO BREAK THE LAW BY ANTE-DATING A DOCUMENT.

SERIOUSLY.

AND DON'T FORGET MY ZIPS!!

OR THE HARD-DRIVES.

JUDGE HOWARD MATZ WILL GET BAFFLED AND DISTURBED AGAIN!!

SEE: A.K.A. THE COMPUTER EXPERT.

A.K.A. THE MISSING MAC

SEE ALSO THE WORTHLESS FILE

SEE ALSO THE MISSING EXPERTS

SEE ALSO THE MISSING DOCTOR

SEE ALSO THE MISSING ACCUSED

SEE ALSO THE MISSING CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW.

SEE ALSO THE MISSING SIXTH AMENDMENT.

DO SO PROMPTLY.

WATCH AN ACT OF "AGONY," OVER, AND AFTER, THE FACT.

 

BUT THEY STILL IGNORED IT, THEN BROKE THE LAW, AND VIOLATED DUE PROCESS, WILLFULLY AND WITH SPECIFIC INTENT.

 

YOU LIKE AGONY????

YOU GONNA GET IT THEN, WHEN YOU LEAST EXPECT IT!

 

HIS DAYS OF ILLEGAL SENTENCES FOR THE COPORATE BIG WIGS WHO OWN THE COPORATE PRISONS, FOR THEIR CUBICLE COWS, IS OVER.

Procedural Unconscionability

A determination of whether a contract is procedurally unconscionable focuses on two factors: oppression and surprise.

"`Oppression' arises from an inequality of bargaining power which results in no real negotiation and an >absence of meaningful choice.

`Surprise' involves the extent to which the supposedly agreed-upon terms of the bargain are hidden in the prolix printed form drafted by the party seeking to enforce the disputed terms." Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc., 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 138, 145 (Ct.App.1997).

 

 

10.21.2003

Page 22, Lines 3-6
Judge Matz: “I have read carefully every response that has gotten to "us" and I’m satisfied and I’m making a finding that all of your contentions about lost, destroyed, unaccounted-for evidence are unfounded.”

Saavedra: “Excuse me, Your Honor, he is correct. They did send him a 100-Megabyte ZIP. Now, stating that his are 250, he is correct. He won’t read it."

Judge: “How long have you known that the Zip disk has not been usable by Killercop?”

Saavedra: “When he told me that a couple of weeks ago. He didn't even have a ZIP disk. And of the evidence that I was sent in to MDC, there was not one ZIP disk anywhere.

Killercop: “That’s correct.”

A.K.A. ANOTHER SAD STORY OF A PERVERTED COVER-UP AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE.

A PRETTY GOOD SYSTEM!!

THE COURT: Let the record reflect that there is nothing on this document that contains any Internet Protocol -- IP -- address information. It does show that there was a contact with Network Solutions. If you want to find out whether they got the precise IP address that you gave on the record a few questions ago, you may need to show him another document.

KILLERCOP: Your Honor --

THE COURT: Please move on!!

KILLERCOP: Respectfully, Your Honor, and I mean very respectfully, I would point the Court's attention to No. 7 on this document and No. 8 that we are looking at and direct the Court's attention to 24.160.57.210.

THE COURT: I am incorrect. You are correct.

Top 10 Signs Of A Fraud

This page is dedicated to my late Dad, Arnold Sutcliffe. Retired, U.S. Air Force, who passed away in 2009. Dad taught me to answer to only one authority, save God, and that is the small, still voice inside my heart.

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

THIS PREMIUM, 25 YEAR OLD DOMAIN NAME, ALL RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA AND ALL OF IT'S CONTENTS ARE FOR SALE, SEPERATELY OR ALL AT ONCE, IN ONE EASY BID!

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES BIDS.