FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

JUDGE MATZ

"SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL SENTENCES!

GOSH, IF ONLY HE HAD KNOWN! HE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT KILLERCOP'S RIGHT NOT TO BE TRIED, NOW SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE!!


SECRETS

Not only does Judge A. Howard Matz not follow the law, he ignores it, or just Changes the Words of the Law.

 

 

"Only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

Epic corruption exposes the secret trial of Killercop.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person, on the left," and "the person of another," person, on the right.

STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

CENSORED WIKI

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, LAW BREAKER

IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN???

THEY ALL KNEW!!

 

BUT IT IS A SECRET! AND JUDGE MATZ LOVES A SECRET!


EXAMPLES:::::

OCT 08 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR-00-01007-AHM-01
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50558

"Blakely issues exist with regard to the loss and restitution calculations which were based in part on facts neither found by a jury nor admitted by the appellants. We therefore vacate the appellants’ sentences and remand for reconsideration in light of United States v. Ameline, No. 02-30326, (9th Cir. July 21, 2004) (applying Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004) to the United States Sentencing Guidelines). See United States v. Castro, No. 03-50444 (9th Cir. Aug27, 2004) (per curiam)."
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, MOBSTER

In file 2004 11 8.pdf, (Nov 8, 2004)

[ONE MONTH AFTER THE ABOVE RULING]

Judge A. Howard Matz states to Killercop that he read the Castro decision very carefully. But omits knowledge of the above rule of the law, following the guidance he claims to seek. Listen in:

"I've read the Castro decision carefully; and of course, that decision reflects what is the fundamental background context to this motion, which is that we're waiting...for Supreme Court guidance on the aftermath of Blakely and Ameline. How soon that guidance will be provided and what it will be, I have no desire to speculate about, but facing that confusion..."

NOT FOR PUBLICATION  - TOP SECRET

NOV 17 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR 01-1081 AHM
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50383

These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004). See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges would be substantially less.
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION  - TOP SECRET

NOV 17 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR 01-1081 AHM
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50388

"These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004). See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges would be substantially less."
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

COVERED UP :

A.K.A. IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN!!!!!!


JUN 15 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR-01-00238-AHM
Ninth Circuit Court Nos. 03-50014, 03-50017

"We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence as to either Defendant [if it had known] that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory, as the Supreme Court held in Booker. In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it determines to be necessary, including, without limitation, modifying or vacating its previous sentence.

IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN???

HE KNEW, THEY KNEW, YET HE WAS ALLOWED TO HAND DOWN SUBSTANTIAL PRISON SENTENCES, ILLEGALLY.

ALL THE WHILE CLAIMING CONFUSION AND IGNORANCE.

YES, BUT BY WHO? AND HOW MANY OTHERS DID HE ILLEGALLY SENTENCE? AND WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO REMAIN?

ANSWER: ASK HIS GOOD BUDDIES! MATZ WON'T TELL ME, 'CAUSE IT'S A SECRET!

 

 

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH THE SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

 

.

 

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI.

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.