 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
The Case of: "It would be totally against your interests." pru·dent A prudent thing to do...for whom? Darn good thing Judge A. Howard Matz didn't tell me it was provocative!! That would be overstating it. Probably. I mean, it's possible. "The wise in heart shall be called prudent: and the sweetness of the lips increaseth learning." -Proverbs 16: 21 PROMPTLY ON THE RECORD WITH FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, A. HOWARD MATZ
"For you to go to bat and take the case to trial or even to pursue a plea, if that's what you were alluding to before, with these lawyers is going to be totally against your interest and against my duty to assure that you get effective assistance of counsel." ~Howard Matz. Summer of 2002, pre-trial of Killercop.
"Indeed, it is the duty of trial courts to protect an accused's right to counsel..." See Sandoval v. Calderon, 241 F.3d 765, 774 (9th Cir. 2000) 08.22.2002 Page 20, Lines 16-19 Judge: “If you are not seeking to represent yourself you're making a wise decision” Page 32, Lines 13-14 Killercop: “I’m just a cog in the wheel at this point.” ENTER TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE. WINTER 2002 "So that's one alternative. You get another lawyer. But you get-that lawyer, and it could be a man or a woman, on the basis and in the manner I just described. In principle, the alternative to you having another lawyer derived from that method is to represent yourself. I don't know whether that's what you're seeking.
I really don't understand what you're seeking. But if that's what you're seeking, then I would do my best to bang you on the head and kick you on the shins, and I'm speaking figuratively, I don't mean that literally, talk you out-of-that, Because it would be totally against your interests." ~Howard Matz. Winter of 2002, pre-trial of Killercop.
Note: Matz Lost Me @ "I really don't understand...,"
08.27.2003 Page 62, Lines 14-17 Judge Matz: “Okay. Well, I’ve already told you, as you acknowledged earlier today, KILLERCOP, that any individual who chooses to proceed on his own was taking enormous risks and subjecting himself to a considerable disadvantage.”
THIS PAGE SPONSORED BY FARETTA AND THE JUDGES WHO FOLLOW IT. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
TRUE STORY
"So a prudent thing to do for somebody in your situation would be is I'll take my best shot at it. You can take your best shot at being your own lawyer, if you want, or you can be a lawyer." ~Judge A. Howard Matz. Sept. 26, 2003, right after having me committed for a mental treatment in his secret hearing. Prudent to take my best shot? Okay! Don't duck!! It is too bad he wasn't in the same mood to make me that offer when he FORCED a lawyer on me. Matz likes secrets, a more stupefyingly, cryptic euphemism I have yet to behold. Oh, I spoke too soon. HMMMMMMM, SOUNDS TO ME LIKE HOWARD MATZ IS "PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE"...AND ISN'T THAT AGAINST THE LAW? LET'S DOUBLE CHECK OUR FACTS, YEP. BUT LET'S BE PRUDENT AND CHECK ONE MORE TIME...YUP, IT STILL IS. NO LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE BENCH ALLOWED. JUDGE MATZ CLEARLY NEVER READ THE LAW.
SCRATCH THAT, IS A CRIMINAL. IS THAT CRAZY OR WHAT? "CAUSE I KNOW THEY ALL READ IT. HECK, HE WROTE IT, TOO! SO NOW THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE FOR HIZZZ ODER IS WHY?
The law of unintended consequences is an adage or idiomatic warning that an intervention in a complex system always creates unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes.
NOT ONLY IS HOWARD MATZ INCOMPETENT, HE IS “@#$%^ RETARD HANDING OUT ILLEGAL SENTENCES. ASK FARETTA.
"If a wise man behaves prudently, how can he be overcome by his enemies? Even a single man, by right action, can overcome a host of foes." ~Saskya Pandita
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
