 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"I want to assure the court. We agonized over this."
"At best, his extraordinary disregard for the constitutional role demonstrates incompetence; at worst, it creates the impression that he knowingly attempted to hide his most controversial work." "His unwillingness to take seriously his obligation to protect these basic fundamental rights has potentially placed his court in jeopardy." CALL JUDGE HOWARD MATZ: Telephone: 213-894-5283 EMAIL JUDGE MATZ ASK HIM WHAT HE IS SMOKING TODAY?
NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET: MORE DENIAL OF A RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF THE CRIME.
INFORMATION! CONTACT KILLERCOP IF YOU CAN. PROMPTLY!! IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO IN AMERICA IN 2010.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
"You cannot adopt politics as a profession and remain honest."~Ambrose Gwinett Bierce
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241 If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
A SECRET FROM THE KEY OF THE KNOWLEDGE SAY WHAT? THE FOLLOWING UNLAWFUL HEARING TAKES PLACE ON 04.07.2003 IN A DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT.
Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen." Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --"
Doctor Phil Says: Anything Coming Out Of The Mouth After "However," Negates Everything Before That Word. Just Keeping It Real. FOR THE RECORD . "Counsel have not cited and we have been unable to find a single instance of a criminal hearing conducted in secret in any federal, state, or municipal court during the history of this country. Nor have we found any record of even one such secret criminal trial in England since abolition of the Court of Star Chamber in 1641, and whether that court ever convicted people secretly is in dispute. Summary "status conferences" for findings of "incompetence" have not been regarded as an exception to this universal rule against secret trials." Image that..., a Star Chambers hearing, live...in America.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
