 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Despite the historical rejection of the concept of 'harmless' constitutional error, the U.S. Supreme Court, beginning with Chapman v. California (1967), decided that constitutional errors may be "so unimportant and insignificant" as to be deemed harmless. Arizona v. Fulminante (1991) is the culmination of a full retreat from the belief that constitutional rights are the means by which an individual secures liberty against the arbitrary and intrusive actions of the republic. On the basis of the paradigm of principled constitutionalism, no Federal constitutional error can ever be subject to harmless-error analysis. This article recommends statutory changes that will ensure that every criminal defendant who alleges that his/her conviction was the product of a constitutional infirmity will have the opportunity to present arguments before an appellate court to support this claim. Should the court find the existence of constitutional error, it should be bound to have the verdict automatically reversed. It was never necessary, but Judge A. Howard Matz claims he's doing it all "for Killercop's 'best interest'..."
"For you to go to bat and take the case to trial or even to pursue a plea, if that's what you were alluding to before, with these lawyers is going to be totally against your interest and against my duty to assure that you get effective assistance of Counsel." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, Pg. 19, Sept. 23, 2002, Pre-trial of killercop.com. "So a prudent thing to do for somebody in your "situation" [Killercop] would be is, 'I'll take my best shot at it.' You can take your best shot
AND BY "SITUATION," MATZ MEANS BEING FORCED IN A "COMPLEX" COMPUTER CASE, WITH HIS HAND PICKED COUNSEL. AND NO EXPERTS. THIS IS CALLED A BANK UP JOB!
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ IS POWER MAD, AND ARROGANTLY FLAUNTS THE LAW, BY HANDING DOWN "SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL PRISON SENTENCES, EVEN AFTER BEING TOLD WHAT HE WAS DOING IS ILLEGAL.
ILLEGAL AND UNLAWFUL SENTENCES HANDED DOWN BY JUDGE MATZ, WITH SPECIFIC INTENT!
"Your Honor, I move at this point to remove this man as my counsel, as he no longer speaks for me." -Killercop
"All right. Sit down, and I’ll deal with that motion 'later.'" -Judge Matz "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive."~C.S. LEWIS
"I'm not willing to require these lawyers to permit you, against your best interest, to require these lawyers to remain as your lawyers."~Judge Matz, Pg. 21, Sept. 23, 2002, Pretrial of killercop.
TRANSLATION FROM 1984 DOUBLE SPEAK: OKAY, I'M NOT GOING TO FORCE OTHERS ON YOU, OKAY, YES I AM! IT IS PRUDENT! YOU ARE MY CAPTIVE! SO IT WOULD BE A PRUDENT THING FOR YOU TO REPRESENT YOURSELF!!
Hizzzzzoner refused to allow Killercop to represent himself!... until it suited Hizzzzzoner's complex secret agenda on his desk for the secret, illegal and unlawful "status conference." How you like those apples, Johnny!
LAW AND FACTS: "Once a defendant makes an unequivocal request to proceed pro se, the court must hold a hearing—commonly known as a Faretta hearing—to determine whether the defendant is knowingly and intelligently forgoing his right to appointed counsel. United States v. Mendez-Sanchez, 563 F.3d 935, 945 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835)."
A FACT AND A QUESTION. WITHOUT ASSISTANCE OF THE COUNSEL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ COULD HAND OUT MANY "SUBSTANTAIL ILLEGAL SENTENCES," AND DID JUST THAT!! SEE EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATION ARTICLE ON THE LEFT: "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" ON THE RECORD:
"YOU got too much baggage in this case. And it's not necessary for me to make any findings about who's right and who Is wrong. I'm not saying you're wrong. I don't know for sure."
Well, at least he got that last part right. He doesn't know the law, he is just guessing. Or making up facts. Matz is very selective on his "findings." Especially about a recusal of a friend, or himself. Everything else is "just your opinion." And he plays dumb when it serves his, or his buddies, needs. A. Howard Matz can even play stupid.
FINDINGS: All Rights Reserved On The Record. None waived. Killercop's criminal case he personally signed off as a "complex" case.) No effective "assistance" of counsel found at the beginning of the complex trial. A computer illiterate, for the defense! No effective assistance means yes, forced assistance! And then denial. Then forced. Then another denial. Then blame it on you. No "Confrontation Clause" found here. No "Due Process" found here. Or here. No Doctor found here. Or here. No Certificate found here. No "Nature and Cause" found here. No law found here. No assistance of the counsel found here, either. No admission of any guilt, still, found here. No spirit, or letter, of the law found here.
Denials of the right to confront my accusers, that was used to further deny speedy trial rights, and subpoena witnesses found here. Justice and Irony found here. "Frivolous" misstatements found here. Goblins can be found here. A fact can be found here. And here. Howard's close friend, Alex Kozinski, who cleans up Howard's "mistakes," and rigs the stages and decks of the U.S.S. CORUPTION, in between bragging publicly about his server with his porn stash, during his rigged appeal, with the court's jester, is found here.
The Second Amendment deals directly with the right of an individual to keep and bare arms to protect themselves from an overreaching federal government." And tyrants!
In America today, in 2010, we are full of Federal Gods and other-world Goblins who claim they are from the government and are here to help you.
You just "have to" look! They did, and so do you. You have no choice. No, seriously, you have no choice. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
