 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
An illegal, entire officewide disqualification. KILLERCOP BEGGED THE JUDGE NOT TO LET THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS QUIT! JUDGE MATZ SAYS HE LET THEM QUIT "FOR KILLERCOP'S OWN GOOD." THEN JUDGE MATZ BLAMED KILLERCOP FOR THEIR QUITTING. WITH A JUDGE LIKE THAT, WHO NEEDS A PROSECUTOR? LETS LISTEN IN...
Judge A. Howard Matz: “Ms. Bednarski, are you telling me in plain language that the communications between your office or any member of your office [of the Federal Public Defenders, Central District of California] on the one hand, and Killercop on the other hand, have been so impaired that the ability to maintain mutual trust and respect and confidence in each other’s respective obligations and positions has been shattered?"
F.P.D. Bednarski: “Yes!”
Judge: “Is that the result of things that were said by one side or the other side in this existing attorney-client relationship?”
Bednarski: “In part.”
A righteous man knows the rights of the poor; a wicked man does not understand such knowledge. -Proverbs 29:7 "Take note of Justice O’Connor’s remarks in 2001 that prompted the New York Times to editorialize that the “legal "representation" afforded most indigent defendants...” is woefully inadequate. -See Editorial, Justice O’Connor on Executions, N.Y. Times, July 5, 2001, at A16.
That is how criminals change a "Right" into an "Entitlement." And speech into conduct. Then both are gone, forever and disappear. And where no becomes a yes. When that happens to you, America... "I am serving you, so you should thank me and treat me with great respect and honor for having robbed you of choice, on your behalf, for your own good, in order to serve you by doing things you don't want me to do." -The Matzrix Every circuit court that has ever reviewed an entire officewide disqualification has been reversed. -See Bolden, 353 F. 3d at 879; Whittaker, 268 F.3d at 194–95; Vlahos, 33 F.3d at 761–63; Caggiano, 660 F.2d at 185. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." -C.S. LEWIS IN ORDER OF APPEARENCE: Hilary L Potashner William S Harris Gregory Nicolaysen Michael J Brennan Represented by SUNG PARK - FOR THE APPEAL. KILLERCOP: "And now, four weeks before trial, they [the Public Defender's Office] appear incompetent to proceed with..., they bring this motion claiming that an actual conflict now exists which is peculiar, unusual, and quite distinct. Their words." "To the extent that my court-appointed public defenders have failed to perform their jobs as that has created a difficulty in their proceeding to trial as ordered by this Court -- I've already pointed out the problems of this Court with no relief -- to grant this request would be to further jeopardize my right to a speedy trial, representation, and/or assistance to competent counsel and right to my freedom."
Judge A. Howard Matz: NEXT UP: WILLIAM HARRIS, ESQ JUDGE MATZ, MEET YOUR HAND PICKED ATTORNEY. HE WILL DO A BANK UP JOB FOR YOU! TRUST ME! GOBLIN GUIDE (CLICK IMAGE ABOVE) A.K.A. A GANG RAPE BY A WOMAN AND HER ASSISTANT! ALSO, ASSISTED BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC PRETENDERS OFFICE AND FURTHER HELD DOWN BY A PANEL OF ADDITIONAL MEN. LET THE RITUAL BEGIN. CASE LAW: FARETTA, RULE 43, THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE & CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS, OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THAT'S A FACT. AROUND HERE I CALL THEM THE FEDERAL PUBLIC PRETENDERS. JUDGE MATZ HATES THAT FORM OF THE FREEDOM OF THE SPEECH...AND WANTS TO DO NOTHING MORE THEN SUPRESS YOURS, TOO! TO HIM, NO MEANS YES! HECK, HE EVEN SUPRESSES HIS OWN SPEECHES. EXAMPLE: NO REPRESENTATION MEANS YES! FORCED REPRESENTATION...UMMMM, I MEAN ASSISTANCE!! NOPE. JUST MORE FORCING.
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
