Experts For The Defense: Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes.





HMMMM, MAYBE HIS MISSING EXPERTS STOLE THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW? 08.22.2002 Page 20, Lines 16-19 Judge Matz: “If you [Killercop] had said to me judge, I want to be my own lawyer, I would have spent a half hour explaining to you why that would be an *absolutely mistaken decision on your part.” Page 20, Lines 24-25 Judge Matz: “If you are not* seeking to represent yourself you’re making a wise decision.” Page 26, Lines 18-23 Judge: “But I will guarantee you that I will set this down for trial and stick to the date, unless there are absolutely compelling conflicts that I can’t get out of, to get you to trial as quickly as possible. But I don’t want you to start the trial before you’re ready. That means your lawyers are ready. And that means the experts are lined up. JAN 10, 2003, Pg 12. "And there are possible issues, since we're talking about electronic evidence here, assuming there's anything different or new that the government has not given to us will be a matter of going through some of this stuff with our expert to see if it's the same that we had before to see if it's complete." -William Harris MARCH 14, 2003, Pg 79 "NOW, I THANK YOUR HONOR FOR THAT, BECAUSE I'M PLANNING TO SUBMIT AN EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR SOMEONE I FINALLY WAS ABLE TO FIND AS A LOCAL EXPERT ON THE COMPUTER ISSUE." - GREG NICOLAYSEN, August 27, 2003 THE COURT: Mr. Nicolaysen, before you're formally relieved of your duties, I want to remind you what I trust you already understand, and I also need to get some information about the state of the record here. Have you received all of the required information that you may have sought from any expert that the court may have appointed to assist in your representation of this defendant, yes or no? MR. NICOLAYSEN: Yes. THE COURT: Have you received all of the required information that you may have sought from any expert that the court may have appointed to assist in your representation of this defendant, yes or no? MR. NICOLAYSEN: Yes. THE COURT: Is there any further work that would be required on behalf of Killercop's defense by any expert the court may have previously appointed at public expense to assist in the defense of Killercop? MR. NICOLAYSEN: No, Your Honor. THE COURT: Did you get all of the materials that had been generated in the nature of work-product materials from the three prior counsel for Killercop? MR. NICOLAYSEN: I believe so, yes. *SEE RIGHT SIDE TOP OF THIS ARTICLE:* "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson REPORT A GANG MEMBER. Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?" WHOIS WSJ NY TIMES HIT PIECE FOX NEWS HIT PIECE NBC NEWS HIT PIECE 2023 HIT LIST (c)1997-2023 All Rights Reserved. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.		READ THE LEFT SIDE FIRST: THEN READ BELOW. Jesus replied, “And you experts* in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them. -Luke 11:46 Transcript of 09.26.2003 Page 20 THE COURT: NOW, I DON'T THINK IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE RECORD TO NOTE THAT I'VE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED EXPERTS, OR AT LEAST ONE EXPERT, I DON'T GO BACK AND CHECK THE FILE BUT AT LEAST ONE EXPERT, AND I THINK COULD HAVE BEEN MORE THAN ONE, SOMEBODY WITH SPECIFIC SKILL AND ADVANCED SKILL IN COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AS WELL TO BE APPOINTED TO REPRESENT OR ASSISlT* PRIOR COUNSEL. HAVE YOU SEEN *ANY* EXPERT REPORTS? MR. REED: NO. NOT. AT. ALL. YOUR. HONOR. THE COURT: HAS ANYBODY DISCUSSED WITH YOU ANY OF KILLERCOP'S PRIOR LAWYERS, ANY EXPERT REPORTS THAT *MAY HAVE* BEEN GENERATED? MR. REED: NO. YOUR. HONOR 10.21.2003 Page 36, Lines 20-25 Judge Matz: “Now, Mr. Reed, one of the items that Killercop has filed seems to suggest that he has never received any or any witness statements. Among the material that you received from prior counsel that you and Mr. Nicolaysen put together for delivery to MDC, do you recall whether any investigative reports prepared by anybody acting on behalf of Killercop? You don’t have to say who did it.” Reed: “On behalf of Killercop - -“ Judge: “Yeah.” Reed: “No.” DID YOU SEE THAT, FOLKS? No. None. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes. How ya like those apples in a "complex computer case?" You bought 3 Experts and reports, 3 of them! Paid for by your tax dollas! Not once, but three times!!! THAT IS HOW YOU THROW AN APPEAL. A FLAPDOODLE FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023) They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW. MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TERMS OF USE DISCLAIMER PRIVACY POLICY TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.