 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Wrong with the force of a five-week old, unrefrigerated dead fish.
To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must, as one member of this court recently stated during oral argument, strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week old, unrefrigerated dead fish. Federal prosecutors apply conspiracy to a variety of situations, making it one of the most commonly charged Federal crimes. Section II of this article outlines the basic elements of a conspiracy offense under section 371, namely, agreement; illegal goal; knowledge, intent, and participation; and overt act. Any statement by a co-conspirator that promotes the main objectives of the conspiracy is considered to be in furtherance of the conspiracy related to evidentiary issues and sixth amendment issues (the right to confront witnesses at trial).
"But either way, you're going to trial, unless you decided that there's an alternative thing you want to do, and I'm hoping you won't, which is plead guilty." ~Judge Howard Matz, Pretrial of Killercop
"The fact is that Killercop used not only entirely different language but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in. There was a link that he had to this killercop web site. The number of victims was different. The nature of the communications was different. " ~Judge Howard Matz, Pretrial of Killercop
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
"[F]indings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.
Hence, "[w]here there are two [permissible] views of the evidence, the fact finder's choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous." Cree v. Flores, 157 F.3d 762, 768 (9th Cir. 1998). See also FED . R. CIV. P. 52(a) (stating that "[f]indings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous[.]").
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
