 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"Killercop is proceeding pro per as a result of my decision to 'deem' his "prior conduct" and "course of conduct" as a waiver of his 6th Amendment right to 'appointed' counsel."~Judge A. Howard Matz.
JUDGE MATZ: “Mr. Reed is in no position to provide even ‘stand by’ position that would be informed in terms of the evidence….[h]e doesn’t even have the evidence.” Page 62, Lines 13-20 JUDGE MATZ: “Now, Mr. Reed, I don’t know whether consistent with the law and the application of the Speedy Trial Act that the rights of a defendant would be protected if a jury were impaneled and the actual prosecution of the case, the opening statements, and the submission of evidence were to follow at some relatively brief interval after that.
You are sitting here with a understandable worried look, if not a scowl on your face, and I understand why and I’m concerned about that. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
The following takes place on 09.02.2003 U.S. Federal Court, Central District, Los Angeles, California. "Other then that, I proceed with all rights reserved until jurisdiction is proved." -Killercop
Killercop: "Thank you, Your Honor. One last objection. I do seek sanctions on Mr. Nicolaysen for failing to turn over that file as ordered. My concerns ARE one, that man has threatened me in the past if I pressured him or made him look bad or forced him to do anything, go to court, he would make sure I lose. Now, he's got my whole world in his hands, my whole world are in his hands right now in that file. All weekend he might be taking stuff. He might be loosing stuff, misplacing stuff. I don't know. All I know [is] this man has threatened me in the past to make me lose this case. Now he's ignoring everybody, doing his own thing. I want that noted for the record." Judge: "Okay. It is noted." (SEE TRANSCRIPT ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS ARTICLE.)
Killercop: "I believe I have the right to challenge the jurisdiction of those charges. It's not personal towards this court, but it's my understanding that a court which has lawful jurisdiction is a competent court. One, which lacks lawful jurisdiction, is an incompetent court. I have asked for it time and time again. I want that right. And I want notice any time I'm brought further into this courtroom. >I don't like being hailed into a court without any notice about what's to take place. >I wish this court to protect that right as well. Other then that, I proceed with all rights reserved until jurisdiction is proved." Judge: "Would you like to meet with Mr. Reed?"
Killercop: "As well as I do not recognize this court, I do not recognize - -"
MAJOR INTERRUPTION AT THIS POINT BY JUDGE: Judge MATZ: "So is it your choice not to have anything in the nature of even a preliminary conversation with Mr. Reed this afternoon?" Killercop: "I believe I stated my objection very clearly. >First I'd like the record to reflect I am not proceeding pro per. If anything, I'll be proceeding suri juris, on my own right, not on my own behalf. I object to any other counsel being foisted over to me. I object to previous just removed counsel's substituting a man on the spot as to be his replacement. And I further object to this court not setting up a hearing forthwith to proffer its jurisdiction over the accused on these specific charges being transmitted in interstate commerce."
Judge MATZ: "But Killercop is preceding I am ordering the clerk, … to contact Mr. Nicolaysen and tell him that Reed is being substituted in place of Mr. Brennan. That's my decision."
Reed: "Well, that I'm not absolutely certain about. If the case is not too complex, then I certainly can be. >There's one month to go before that date approximately and I intend on studying the case, analyzing it. >I would like, of course, to speak with Killercop" Judge MATZ: "Mr. Reed, are you for sure on a standby basis, which I will reiterate, able to proceed as standby counsel in event Killercop chooses to make himself - - to make good use of your availability for purposes of background guidance are you available for those dates?"
Reed: "Yes, I am, Your Honor." Judge Matz: "Now, you understand as is inherent and understood I think by everyone in the concept of stand-by counsel that the role of stand-by counsel, that the role of stand-by counsel sometimes can result in counsel becoming actual counsel by choice of the pro per client or for other reasons. Are you prepared to proceed with that understanding? It's going to be somewhat of an unusual case given Killercop is proceeding pro per as a result of my decision to deem his prior conduct and course of conduct as a waiver of his 6th Amendment right to appointed counsel."
Killercop: "He has ignored the Court's order!" SOURCE FILE
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
