Two elements comprise a successful ineffective-assistance claim. The claimant must first show

1. that counsel “made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed . . . by the Sixth Amendment,”

2. then he must show prejudice—in other words, he must “demonstrate ‘a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 104 (2011) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 694 (1984)).

   SEE Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335

   SEE Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3

   SEE Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806

    

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.

Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS

WSJ

NY TIMES HIT PIECE

FOX NEWS HIT PIECE

NBC NEWS HIT PIECE

2023 HIT LIST

(c)1997-2023

All Rights Reserved.

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.

MEET KILLERCOP'S FIRST ATTORNEY, FORCED ON HIM, AFTER FIRST BEING FORCED TO REPRESENT HIMSELF, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE.

Greg Nicolaysen hates christians. HIS WORDS, NOT MINE.

GREG, THE COMPUTER EXPERT.

FULL DISCLOSURE:

KILLERCOP HAD TWO DISTRICT PUBLIC PRETENDERS, BUT THEY QUIT, CITING AN UNSPOKEN CONFLICT, AND TOOK THE ENTIRE DISTRICT WITH THEM WHEN THEY LEFT THE CASE.

THE TRIAL JUDGE, MATZ, NATURALLY BLAMED THAT ON KILLERCOP AT A LATTER DATE, EVEN THOUGH KILLERCOP BEGGED THE JUDGE NOT TO LET THEM QUIT.

TO MAKE AMENDS, I GUESS, THEY LEFT BEHIND A COMPUTER ILLITERATE ATTORNEY.

THAT DIDN'T WORK, NATURALLY.

HENSE, GREG, THE COMPUTER EXPERT.

KILLERCOP WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM, SO THE JUDGE IGNORED THE RIGHT TO SPEAK AND FORCED GREG ON TO KILLERCOP.

LETS JUST SAY THINGS WENT DOWN HILL FROM THERE. AS IN STRAIGHT TO HELL.

NEXT UP: Attorney MICHAEL BRENNEN, ESQ

AND Attorney DAVID REED, ESQ

A FLAPDOODLE

FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER

(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.

MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.

LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.