 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
In a ham and eggs breakfast, the chicken And the Fox is involved, but the pig is committed. AKA A SHAM OF A SHAM SAY WHAT? "This is an extremely serious responsibility placed on both the hospital institution and the court. There are two important certifications for the director to make. The first is a certification that the person has sufficiently recovered mentally to be released at all. The second is, if the person can be released but only on certain conditions, a certification that the conditions are appropriate. The court bears a vital responsibility as to both."
"I object to the court ruling on my competency without a full hearing under 4247 of Title 18, as well as all rights reserved on the Bill of Rights of rights, because I received no treatments, no psychiatric or psychological interventions since being ruled incompetent on April 7. In the absence of such interventions or treatment, and with my conduct being exactly the same and consistent throughout my hearings and every proceeding that I've been in this courtroom, this entire case, I believe I'm entitled to a hearing to determine on what basis I was deemed incompetent on the first and second instances so that I can determine what criteria I can now be deemed incompetent. I don't know how I'm not incompetent since nothing has changed since the court first found me to be incompetent. I am not saying I believe I'm incompetent, but I'm not sure of the criteria based on this court's findings previously decided. I have yet to even be provided with a copy of Dr. Patenaude's report. If nothing has changed, then how I can be anything different than what I was originally? Furthermore, I frankly don't understand why my presence is needed here today because, as the conduct of the government, the defense counsel, and this court's own action or April 7 clearly prove, all of you believe that the accused nee( not be present in the courtroom or, for that matter, not present in the same state to make a finding -- a judicial finding of fact that the accused is or is not incompetent as required by the law. A finding of competency is one of a fact, not law. United States versus Shepard, 538 F.2d 107 at 110; United States versus Fratus -- F-r-a-t-u-s -- 530 F.2d 644 at page 647; U.S. versus Winn, 577 F.2d 86 at note 14 on page 88; Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, annotations at paragraph 8 on page 2083. Rule 42, which you used to explain my absence obviously does not apply. And since a finding of incompetence is one of clearly a fact, not law -- I am not a corporation -- under the first part of Rule 43. And under the right of due process afforded to an accused in a court, the court could not abridge that right by that rule. Pursuant to Title 18, section 2072 (b), no rule shall abridge, modify or enlarge a substantive right. Rights trump rules. Further, this court never found me incompetent at the March 14th hearing, so the hearing on April 7th should have been conducted pursuant to the protections afforded to an accused under the Fifth Amendment, Due Process, and the Sixth Amendment, Compulsory Process, of the Bill of Rights, as well as U.S.C. 4247 (d) as in Delta. Bottom line is why my presence was not required April 7th, the hearing of my incompetence decision, but it's required today. I'd like the court to please explain these two differences that I've raised."
We are still awaiting his answer in 2010. That's because Matz doesn't follow the law. He listens to goblins and prays to false gods instead.
Good thing my penis didn't fall off because of it. Why? 'Cause I say so! Ya big Gomba!
Killercop Presents A Short Course On Objective Versus Biased Information Processing The variables we have discussed, such as distraction or need
for cognition, tend to influence information-processing activity
in a relatively objective manner—that is, all else being
equal, distraction tends to disrupt whatever thoughts a person Similarly, individuals with high need
for cognition are more motivated to think in general than are
So tell me, what are words for, when no one listens anymore? The Ninth Circuits place the burden on the
government to prove competence. See United States v. Teague, 956 F.2d 1427, 1431 n.10 (7th STILL WAITING ON THE BURDEN...BUT 'TILL THEN...ENJOY AMERICA! "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
Dr. Who? It appears we never met. A.K.A. The Case of Who Is Guarding The Chicken Coop. A.K.A. One Flew Over It!
After toying with killercop, the politics of the system decided to go dark and secret.
KILLERCOP'S HYBRID, HIGH BRED BULL SAYS, THAT'S BULL SHIT!!! The prosecutor was not present when the attorney, who was willingly forced on Killercop, by Hizzzzzoner, Judge A. Howard Matz, proceeded and mooooooooved" to have "his" client sent for a mental treatment. So it had a hearing, and the prosecutor was ordered by the judge to file a motion to have Killercop sent to a mental hospital for "treatment." This invidious law is known as 4241(d). The cover up can be found here. Just kozisayso! The invidious word used to invoke it is callrd "hybrid." Only problem is NOBODY made a factual finding under the law of incompetence during an examination. So they held a secret hearing and ignored the law, again. How nice that everyone is in agreement that killercop needed to be sent away for a medical "treatment." You betcha!! The facts remain that the prosecutor was in the hallway for the hearing by [the attorney] and the judge, and then filed the wrong law on returning to the hearing. So as to not break the law, so flagrantly, after being challenged, the motion was quickly "PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED." This is where files go... to disappear. And the system sends you to disappear. Also see SUNG. for more on missing files. Killercop was shipped off to Boston, like freight, and placed under the tender hand of Dr Patenaude, AKA Doctor Who. After filing a motion to "stop the insanity" with the Ninth Circus, (PDF) the Appeal judge Kozinski and judge Matz simply covered it up. Nothing could stop these 2 liberal lunatics! That was a fact! They are best buddys! And corrupted. Dr. Who then asked Killercop, "Do you know why you were sent here?" Killercop: "Noooooooooo. Unless someone had a secret hearing, since nobody found me incompetent, under the law."
Dr. Who: "Do you think people are having secret hearings about you?" Killercop: "Fuck you and stop trying to shrink me, stay away from me and we'll get along fine. I see your game." Months pass and Winter turns to Spring, and proof of the secret hearing finally arrives in the mail at the Hospital for the Criminally Insane, but only after the attorney forced on Killercop, Greg Nicolaysen, tries to intimidate Killercop and tell him over the phone that he might be kept there, "forever" in his own private Star Chambers, if Killercop still refuses to "answer the questions of the examiner and cooperate." Imagine that... After continuing to refuse, and armed with the proof of the secret hearing, finally, the Warden of the Hospital for the Criminally Insane sent Killercop back to California, where much later on Sept. 27, 2003, a hearing was again held. Only this time Killercop was invited. And he denied receiving any treatment or exams. (PDF) A QUOTE: "Now -- but then, again, that is just kind of a side opinion. "I didn't evaluate" for that with him. "I didn't specifically speak to him" about that." ~{Dr.] Thomas Patanaude, Trial Of Killercop.com, Incompetence Hearing, Aug. 27, 2003
Thomas Patanaude and the Director of the facility failed to follow the law and send a letter of certification. Imagine that... Matz didn't care. Nor did anyone else care. But I'm no expert. I wonder which is more ironic, that he didn't send it, and broke the law, with impunity (Thanks Judge Matz!), or the fact that Matz knew the guy was a quack, and if Thomas Patanaude signed the certificate, he would have broken another law, called perjury. When Killercop sought more of those mising rights, like Due Process, by seeking the certificate required by the law, or experts, Matz covered that up...with his buddies. So did Greg, he was to busy fighting with the newest attorney, David Reed. And calling Jude A. Howard Matz, MATZO BALL, because he hates Christians and jewish judges. I think he hates every one. I think he most likey beats his childen, too. But that is most likely a mixed question. Seriously, folks, read it, I couldn't make it up if I tried!!
Later, the appeals of the exact same issue (re Dr Who And The False Reports) around America started arriving across the land in all different Federal Courts of the Land, all saying the same thing Killercop claimed about Dr. Who, many, many months earlier. That it was a sham and that he never "treated" or even "examined" Killercop. So Matz knew, or as the attorneys and people who persecute others for a living like to say, had a duty to know, that the report submitted by the missing Dr. was unreliable and a FRAUD ON THE COURT!
Seeing a trend? From the First Circuit to the 10th he wreaked havoc. Not in the Ninth. It was all shhhhhhhhhhhhh and secret. FACT: Killercop continues to protest his innocence in the above case. But his Suri Juris appeal for rehearing, was ruled on by one single judge, which violates the federal rules, which such rules mean even less to them then the laws; these "rulers of men." Just in case you are in a position to assist. You don't have to have a certificate or be an expert to look and see what the judge is covering up. Or what the appeals court covered up.
"A "true" threat, in fact, is a Legal term that can claim no more notice from the SUBjective OR OBJECTIVE critic than he grants the charge of heresy raised by the theologian, or the charge of immorality raised by the police.”
So "Don't get in my face about it and you better not throw anything on me or my family or I'll stomp a mudhole in your Ass and walk it dry." ~ O'Brien | 12.10.06 - 2:17 am
Hey, before you leave, how can the Chief Justice forget 35 words written in the country's con-situation? ANSWER: Because he forgot the Bill of the Rights, too. They're secretly substituted them with a Bill of the Entitlements. You only find out this FACT after they get you for your thought crimes. If they can ignore your 10 fundamental rights, as a measly couple of entitlements, then you haven't a hope against their rules, regulations and codes. At least those which are not hidden. SAY WHAT? "HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL" ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24 LATER, HE SAID HE IS SORRY...NOT! He can be slow about these kind of things...I think HE WANTS TO CONFESS. I MEAN, HE CAN'T DENY THE REVENGE THING!
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
