
A FRAUD AND TREASON UPON THE COURT, BY AN ASSUMPTION OF THE JURISDICTION, THROUGH AN INFERENCE AND FALSE CONFESSION. ALL FOR THE POWER TO SHUT THE INTERNET DOWN!!
FOR THE RECORD:
2022
"I DON'T
ADMIT TRANSMITTING."
"
NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL."
I, KILLERCOP, AFFIRM UNDER PAIN AND PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE DOCUMENT ON THE RIGHT IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY AND CAN PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL, IF DEMANDED LEGALLY, LAWFULLY AND POLITELY. SO KEEP YOUR DOGS AT BAY! I AM ARMED, AGAIN. BELIEVE IT!
YOU CAN CATCH A DEAD FISH WITH ANY JURISDICTIONAL HOOK.
A "jurisdictional hook" is a "'provision in a federal statute that requires
the government to establish specific facts justifying the exercise of federal
jurisdiction in connection with any individual application of the statute.'" United States v. McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting
United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 471 (3d Cir. 1999)), overruled on
other grounds by Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), as recognized in
United States v. McCalla, 545 F.3d 750, 756 (9th Cir. 2008).
Similarly, in United States v. Killercop, we held that an identical
jurisdictional hook in 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) was satisfied where the "[d]efendant electronically sent threats and social
security numbers to internet servers located across state
lines." 505 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir. 2007).
In that case, the government presented evidence that the defendant's website,
which contained the threats, was uploaded to various servers
located in multiple states.

"If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because my role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of the truth."
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
2023 HIT LIST
(c)1997-2023
THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL WORDS OF THE EMAIL SENT TO SUNG PARK, ESQ, COUNSEL OF THE RECORD OF THE STATE.
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:35 PM
To: Sung B. Park
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: jurisdiction
SHOW ME WHERE YOU
BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT PROVED I TRANSMITTED ANY PAGE ESTABLISHED THROUGH A
NETWORK LOG FILE.
IN ALL THE CASES
CITED THE ACCUSED ADMITTED TRANSMITTING.
THE GOVERNMENT WAS NEVER PUT TO
THE CRUCIBLE OF PROVING IT.
I DON'T
ADMIT TRANSMITTING.
[SINCERELY,
KILLERCOP]
RIGHT AFTER THE RIGGED HEARING, BY JUDGE MATZ' BUDDY, ALEX KOZINSKI, SUNG PARK ANNOUNCED HE "QUIT," IN THE PARKING LOT, DUMPED BOXES FROM HIS TRUNK AND ANOUNCED HE WAS GOING TO WORK FOR MR. BONNER AT HOMELAND SECURITY. AHHH JUDGE MATZ' OL' TAG TEAM WAS ALIVE AND STILL KICKING.

ALL I HAVE LEFT IS RESTORATION, OR CONFRONTATION, AMERICA.
MY INTERPERTATION THIS TIME,
NOT THEIRS,
OR YOURS.
See the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution.

(“Interpretation of a word or phrase depends
upon reading the whole statutory text, considering the purpose
and context of the statute, and consulting any precedents or
authorities that inform the analysis.”); Buckhannon Bd. and
Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human
Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 615 (2001) (“Words that have
acquired a specialized meaning in the legal context must be
accorded their legal meaning.”). Absent a more specific statutory
definition, “[j]udicial jurisdiction implies the power to
hear and determine a cause . . . .” United States v. O’Grady,
89 U.S. 641, 647 (1874).
LIKE A GOD AMONGST MERE MORTALS!

"He's just a victim," said Roslawati, 30, as tears streamed from both eyes. "He didn't post that video ..." Like many Indonesians, she uses just one name.
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
THIS SPACE FOR SALE
All Rights Reserved.
|
 |