 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
A FRAUD AND TREASON UPON THE COURT, BY AN ASSUMPTION OF THE JURISDICTION, THROUGH AN INFERENCE AND FALSE CONFESSION. ALL FOR THE POWER TO SHUT THE INTERNET DOWN!! FOR THE RECORD: 2022 "I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING." " NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL." I, KILLERCOP, AFFIRM UNDER PAIN AND PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE DOCUMENT ON THE RIGHT IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY AND CAN PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL, IF DEMANDED LEGALLY, LAWFULLY AND POLITELY. SO KEEP YOUR DOGS AT BAY! I AM ARMED, AGAIN. BELIEVE IT! YOU CAN CATCH A DEAD FISH WITH ANY JURISDICTIONAL HOOK. A "jurisdictional hook" is a "'provision in a federal statute that requires the government to establish specific facts justifying the exercise of federal jurisdiction in connection with any individual application of the statute.'" United States v. McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 471 (3d Cir. 1999)), overruled on other grounds by Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), as recognized in United States v. McCalla, 545 F.3d 750, 756 (9th Cir. 2008). Similarly, in United States v. Killercop, we held that an identical
jurisdictional hook in 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) was satisfied where the "[d]efendant electronically sent threats and social In that case, the government presented evidence that the defendant's website,
"If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because my role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of the truth."
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL WORDS OF THE EMAIL SENT TO SUNG PARK, ESQ, COUNSEL OF THE RECORD OF THE STATE.
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:35 PM To: Sung B. Park Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: jurisdiction
SHOW ME WHERE YOU BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT PROVED I TRANSMITTED ANY PAGE ESTABLISHED THROUGH A NETWORK LOG FILE. IN ALL THE CASES CITED THE ACCUSED ADMITTED TRANSMITTING. THE GOVERNMENT WAS NEVER PUT TO THE CRUCIBLE OF PROVING IT.
[SINCERELY,
KILLERCOP] RIGHT AFTER THE RIGGED HEARING, BY JUDGE MATZ' BUDDY, ALEX KOZINSKI, SUNG PARK ANNOUNCED HE "QUIT," IN THE PARKING LOT, DUMPED BOXES FROM HIS TRUNK AND ANOUNCED HE WAS GOING TO WORK FOR MR. BONNER AT HOMELAND SECURITY. AHHH JUDGE MATZ' OL' TAG TEAM WAS ALIVE AND STILL KICKING.
ALL I HAVE LEFT IS RESTORATION, OR CONFRONTATION, AMERICA. NOT THEIRS, OR YOURS. See the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution.
(“Interpretation of a word or phrase depends
LIKE A GOD AMONGST MERE MORTALS!
"He's just a victim," said Roslawati, 30, as tears streamed from both eyes. "He didn't post that video ..." Like many Indonesians, she uses just one name.
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
