 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
IGNORE A JUDGES ORDERS WITH IMPUNITY!!!
MATZ: "Now, I'm baffled here. We had considerable colloquy about getting the necessary ZIP-type equipment to Killercop! "BECAUSE I AM UTTERLY ASTONISHED, BAFFLED, AND UPSET THAT DESPITE MY EFFORTS AND ORDERS [TO GREG NICOLAYSON] THAT THE MATERIAL HAS NOT BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM ONE LAWYER TO THE SUCCESSIVE LAWYER AND IS NOT IN THE CURRENT POSSESSION OF THE STANDBY LAWYER OR THE DEFENDANT. " ~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, PRETRIAL OF KILLERCOP NOTE: WHAT HE WAS REALLY UPSET ABOUT WAS HE HAD TO NOW COVER UP MORE OF THE MESS HE PERSONALLY MADE. MAYBE WHEN MATZ GETS ANGRY HE GETS POSESSED? IT'S VERY COMPLEX. AM I BEING PRETTY CLEAR? IT IS A PRUDENT THING TO DO!
JURISDICTIONAL LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO!
SHOW ME YOUR JURISDICTION, OTHER THEN ONLY 'CAUSE YOU SAY IT IS SO, OR SHOW ME THE PERSON OF ANOTHER!! OR THAT GOBLIN!
Don't be bamboozled! HE'S BAFFLED AND DISTURBED. IT IS PART OF HIS COY AND CAGEY GAME OF DISINFORMATION. NOBODY FROM HARVARD CAN BE THAT STUPID. IF SO, THAT IS A POWERFUL STUPID.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Judge Matz said he was "baffled and disturbed"
SHOOT, I RECKEN' THIS AIN'T THE FIRST TIME A. HOWARD MATZ HAS BEEN ASTONISHED, BAFFLED AND DISTURBED. (See left side of this page and below.) One month after the September 11, 2001 attacks, DEA officials served search and arrest warrants on the Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Center and its directors Scott Imler, Jeff Yablan, and Jeff Farrington. The three plead guilty to charges in Federal Court, but US District Judge Howard A Matz would eventually sentence the defendants to no jail time and 1 year probation and a $100 fee, the absolute most lenient sentence allowable under the law. During sentencing Judge Matz called the prosecution "badly misguided" and said he was "baffled and disturbed" that the Department of Justice would use their [un]limited resources to prosecute the men. In an appeal which would follow along later, over half of the original jury which convicted the three, would turn up at the Appeals Court, to sit with the defendants in a show of solidarity. IN KILLERCOP'S CASE, MATZ GIVE THE PUBLISHER AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE AND REFUSED TO CORRECT IT. JUST LIKE HE FAILED HIS VITAL TASK OF PRODUCING THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW! JUST ASK THE EXPERTS.
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
