 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
I DON'T THINK
"I don't think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Killercop, that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don't think that's what the trial is likely to focus on at all." ~Judge Howard Matz.
WELL I DO THINK...AND I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE BOOK YOU WROTE ON THE PROCEDURES.
But, we do not count your continuances granted by the district court where it made no specific findings supporting a general mantra[s] of 'complexity'." --(US v. Aviles, 170 F.3d 863, 869 (9th Cir.1998)).
Thus, there is a clear distinction between a 'complex' case as defined by the law." SEPTEMBER 2, 2003, Pg 9-10 JUDGE MATZ: "Now, you understand as is inherent and understood I think by everyone in the concept of stand-by counsel that the role of stand-by counsel sometimes can result in counsel becoming actual counsel by choice of the pro per client or for other reasons. Are you prepared to proceed with that understanding?" MR. REED: "Well, that I'm not absolutely certain about. If the case is not too complex, then I certainly can be."
SEPTEMBER 26, 2003, Pg 3 Lines 18-22 Prosecutor: “[b]ut part of the reason why in a case like this it has been turned over so far in advance and the court made this case complex, I think rightfully so, because of the huge amount of electronic evidence was so the defense team could work through this, …” AUSA Duarte: "He has, as to whether or not that would be possible. But, your honor, to use a similar analogy, I think -- maybe I won't even try -- part of the reason why, and I know you want to address this later, but part of the reason why in a case like this it has been turned over so far in advance and the court made this case complex, I think rightfully so, because of the huge amount of electronic evidence was so that the defense team could work through this, and this..." - September 26, 2003, pg 72 Matz: anything else, Mr. Reed? Mr. Reed: your honor, once the CDROMS are provided to me, since they are rather complex,...
Page 74, Lines 6-14 The nature of the evidence is a little bit foreign to me because I'm not good at the - - but the nature of the issues are pretty straightforward and clear. So I think without prejudicing it that it may not be necessary to consume significant amounts of time to assure that Mr. Reed feels in good faith in his mind that he's up to speed.” November 19, 2003 KILLERCOP: Yes. Thank you, Your Honor. First off, I would object to the legal language as plain and simple. It's very complex. And I've never experienced this type of -- the record clearly reflects I don't want to be here representing myself. So, first off, while the language might be plain and simple to Your Honor, I respectfully argue that it's not. I could sit here and speak, if Andrew Ramsey was back up on the stand, computer language and I could say the same thing. "Hey, it's plain and simple." To me, it's plain and simple. To anybody else hearing it, it's gobbledegook and complicated and very heavy. Trial Day 6, November 19, 2003 November 26, 2003, Trial Day 9, Pg 1705 Killercop: Yes. I would object to this quite a bit, Your Honor. In interstate or foreign commerce, when it utilizes instrumentalities of interstate or foreign commerce, it does not set forth the true nature of the Internet and the elements that surround what the Internet consists of. The Internet is comprised of more than just what is vaguely called "instrumentalities." It's a very complex system. It's a very in-depth system." "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
A "Complex" computer case??? Only the most complex cases!
"This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't." ~William Harris, FPD. (Assigned by Judge Matz to handle this "complex computer case brought by Debra Wong Yang.") THE COURT OF JUDGE MATZ DECLARES: "I think you could have somebody who has never seen a computer but is a fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That's my view." ~Judge Howard Matz, in reply to William Harris of the FPD office, above. THE LAW SAYS: THEY MUST FIRST FILE THIS. THEY DIDN'T.
BUT WHO IS FOLLOWING LAW IN THIS CASE, BUT I?
CERTAINLY NOT JUDGE MATZ, AND CERTAINLY NOT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!!
HERE COME THE EXPERTS...NOT!! ARE THEY COMING IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE?? OR DO THEY COME WITH SUBPOENAS? BIG MACS? PRETRIAL PRISON FOOD SUCKS!
MATZ IS STILL MAKING COMPLEX ERRORS! AND MORE ILLEGAL SENTENCES. LIVE NOT BY BREAD ALONE. THIS PAGE SPONSORED BY FARETTA! Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
