 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This court reviews de novo whether a defendant was denied the right to conflict-free representation. Unless they are too busy watching and trading porn.
NEW: SOUND BYTES OF THE ORAL CONFESSION OF KOZINSKI AND SUNG, VIOLATING THE SEPERATION OF POWERS ACT, WHEN THEY AGREED TO "MAKE" LAW [POLICY].
A Bright Light Shone In The Sky
I certainly never told him I transferred anything. That included the word "posted," for the record. As In Nothing.
Judge Kozinski Seems To Believe Mysterious Things Happen With The Internet.
Like "Accidental Facts" Getting Routed Just To His Tiny Wizard Mind To Give Him The Jurisdiction Where He Has No Fact Other Then A False Confession, After He Spoon Feeds The Words To Make His False Record To Get Around The Fact That The Government's Burden Is They Must Prove Transmission And Not Just Assume It. Or Put Words Into The Jury's Mouth's, Either. Otherwise Who Knows Where Their Power To Stop Ends
I'll Bet Anyone That This Judge Is Gonna Be Really Upset That The Assistant Prosecutor Gave Me 8000 NUMB3RS.
Or Maybe Debra And She Didn't Tell Him, Either.
Hmmmmm, Then It's Our Little Secret.
We Do Want To Re-present The Record Accurately.
MY PETITION, WHICH THE WIZARD REFUSED TO FILE AS A MATTER OF A RECORD. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Once Upon A Time He "Sung" Like A Bird
The appeal of the UNSPOKEN CONFLICT, Right!! Correct!! A Real Yes Maker. Meet the government's "re-presenter," A.K.A. the conflicted Public Pretender, appearing magically "for the defense,"and another of many forced on Killercop. But they saved the worse for the last.
A Couple Of Questions, America, But The Answer Can't Be "Appeal 'Strategy.'" Sung Park, Esquire, one of several rampant attorneys at large, and almost the last of many conflicted ones forced on killercop by the Ninth Realm, in the Land Of Koz, is now currently employed by Homeland Security, since he QUIT the day of the appeal, in the parking lot as he emptied his trunk of case files into the back of my car. Think about that one for a moment. Homeland security is Alex's buddy, and my trial judge's best and closest friend, Robert "The Boner" Bonner.
He knew Killercop adamantly denied "transmitting," so why the blatant lie to go along with the words the Wizard was spoon feeding him? 'Cause he was bought off. Another of a stirng of frauds on the court.
So he just flew away and vanished...like the Doctor's certificate. And the discovery.
Sung knew for a fact that Killercop never would, or did, admit transmitting anything against the law; and nor did the government ever prove he did transmit anything against the law.
So, again, why would he falsely confess that killercop was guilty of transmitting anything illegal when he knew the government had no proof?
Or why would the Ninth Circus Perv, force-feed him more lies, and he admit to those spoon-fed lies, knowing they were lies he could never prove. Moreover, he was so confused he even got a hint of a backbone and said: this. He certainly knew the legal standard for the burden of the proof. Hell, one judge even spelled it out for him.
Here are some choices:
Examine some of the players, then play connect the dots...
You might find violations of the rights under the Bill, euphemistically labeled technical errors. Those are now called "entitlements."
That way, a technical error of an entitlement is not the same as a flagrant violation of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution they swore to uphold, protect and defend.
Look Mac, it's complex. Okay? So walk away and mind your own business. Or I unleash the Goblin.
Speaking of which, "Did you know the original penny in America had the motto: "Mind Your Own Business"
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
