 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Judge A. Howard Matz meant prudent for them. Since he created and aided the "situation." A.K.A. The case of a man of many languages, . figuratively, literally and hypothetically. A.K.A. Am I pretty clear?
Waiver of right to counsel—model language. Before a waiver of right to counsel will be considered knowing, intelligent and voluntary, the defendant must be aware of: a. the nature of the charges against him or her, United States v. Keen, 104 F.3d 1111, 1114 (9th Cir. 1996)
I really don't understand what you're seeking. But if that's what you're seeking, then I would do my best to bang you on the head and kick you on the shins, and I'm Speaking figuratively, I don't mean that literally, talk you out-of-that, because it would be totally against your interests." ~Howard Matz. Winter of 2002, pre-trial of Killercop. TOTALLY AGAINST MY INTERESTS? HE'S DOING IT FOR ME, YOU AND US?? FOR THE CITIZEN. FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION? FOR THE PROTECTION OF A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT? NAAAAAAAAAA!
HE COULD CARE LESS WHEN RIGHTS ARE NOT PROTECTED AND WHEN THE LAW IS NOT FOLLOWED, ON PURPOSE.
HE WILL GO SO FAR AS TO CONSPIRE WITH OTHERS TO COVER UP HIS AND OTHERS CRIMES.
Focus is on competence to waive right to counsel. The focus should be on the defendant’s competence to waive the right to counsel, not legal competence. United States v. Arlt, 41 F.3d 516, 518 (9th Cir. 1994) (citations omitted). The burden is on the government to show any waiver was knowingly and intelligently waived.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Lets Rewind And Read Judge Matz' Previous Comments About Killercop "Representing" Himself. Page 60, Lines 15-17 Page 62, Lines 14-17 01.14.2003 Page 14 Now you really need to tell me what you want as between those two alternatives. It’s no longer a question of you or Mr. Harris.” Page 18
SEE QUOTE BELOW “I would therefore request respectfully this court order the Public Defender’s Office to be prepared to try the case on October 22 [2002] as so ordered and to deny any motion to be relieved.”
RIGHT, PROFESSOR? CAN YOU HELP, AMERICA? Or did someone throw on the Internet Kill switch. HURRY BEFORE SOMEONE DIES. CHECK THE VITAL SIGNS!
SEEMS LIKE A PRUDENT THING TO DO, NO?
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
defendant omitted)
