 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Momma always said, "PLAYING STUPID IS NOT A HEALTHY WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE. NEITHER IS PLAYING IGNORE THE FACTS OF YOUR LIFE." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right...to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor..." U.S. CONST. amend. VI. The Supreme Court has held that this right includes "[t]he right to offer the testimony of witnesses, and to compel their attendance, if necessary, [and] is in plain terms the right to present the defendant's version of the facts [i.e. a defense]..." Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S. Ct. 1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967). Furthermore, a defendant's right to compulsory process "is a fundamental element of due process of law." Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. at 19. Twenty years after Washington v. Texas, the Supreme Court noted in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S. Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) that "[o]ur cases establish, at a minimum, that criminal defendants have the right to the government's assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt." Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. at 56. A defendant's right to compulsory process is violated by arbitrary rules of evidence that operate to deny the defendant the right to call witnesses whose testimony is relevant and material to the defense. Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 52, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L. Ed.2d 37 (1987). "The very integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in the system depends on full disclosure of all the facts, within the framework of the rules of evidence. To ensure that justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the defense." United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 709, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974).
A SIMPLE FACT TO LEAVE YOU WITH TO SAY THANKS FOR COMING BY HERE TO LISTEN TO MY WORDS. DON'T RETREAT AMERICA, RELOAD.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
A.K.A. THE CASE OF THE GUMP MOMENTS OF HIZZZZZZ ODER.Primary investigative jurisdiction of offenses in 18 U.S.C. § 1951 lies with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
"Judge A. Howard Matz can play stupid with the best of them, I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. He's trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know." ~Killercop Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
