|

If “Possession is nine-tenths of the law,” what are the points
it outweighs?

The expression “possession is nine-tenths of the law” is from the eighteenth
century and means that in the pursuit of justice possession in a
dispute over property outweighs these nine other essential elements of
a good court case: a lot of money, a lot of patience, a good cause, a good
lawyer, good counsel, good witnesses, a good jury, a good judge, and
good luck.

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, it affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . ..
"A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA
REASONABLE DOUBT
DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND.
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved |
Subject: The "art" of the capitalization
In the world of hi-tech gadgetry, I've noticed that more and
more people who send text messages and emails have long
forgotten the "art" of capitalization.
Those of you who fall into this world, please take note of the
statement below. I cannot stress enough how grammar is very
important to it.
Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack
off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
Is everybody clear on that?

She tried to get it back..but too late. She didn't ask nice. Instead she was a beeeyatch, excuse me, I mean a witch.
But any expert would know that was coming...seen any by the way?
The common myth is that any statute passed by legislators (read attorneys), bearing the appearance of law constitutes " law of the land."
Or that you can NOT challenge the jurisdiction of the law, nor even be informed of it's Nature and Cause.
If the Constitution is the highest Law of the Land, and any statute to be valid, they must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a statute violating it to be valid. One alone must prevail, and that is the Constitution.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)
COLLECT A BOUNTY
COLLECT A REWARD
KILLER MERCH
FILE A COMPLAINT

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved
|  |