FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

NOW OPERABLE!

MEET NORREN EVENS.

SHE BLINKED

 

MAYBE JUDGE MUIRHEAD CAN TEACH HER THAT NO MEANS NO!! AS IN CONGRESS SHALL PASS NO LAW...

MAYBE IF SHE WAS ABOUT TO BE RAPED IN THE ASS, IN THE PRISON IN WHICH THEY SENT KILLERCOP TO SERVE TIME IN, FOR HIS SPEECH AND THOUGHT CRIMES, THE WORD "NO" WOULD TAKE ON A WHOLE NEW MEANING IN HER ATTORNEY-MIND.

 

OR MAYBE HER MOMMY DIDN'T READ HER ANY BEDTIME STORIES, AS A CHILD.

 

MY FAVORITE IS: "LET'S KILL ALL THE LAWYERS" ANOTHER IS CALLED "LETS KILL ALL THE CAPTIVES."

 

THEY ARE AFTER ALL THE ONE'S INCITING THE COPS, UNDER ALL THE RULES, THESE RULERS OF PERSONS AND PEOPLE.

 

AND DON'T START ME ON "HUMAN BEINGS," OR GOBLINS AND OTHER MONSTERS.

 

I SURE WISH THEY WOULD LEARN TO TRAVEL SAFELY.

 

SEEING AS THEY KEEP TELLING ME THAT.

 

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL THAT EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

EPIC CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right.

Do you understand?

NO?

ARE YOU STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

FAQ 1 FAQ 2

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

THE CASE OF KILLERCOP AND THE KONFLIKT OF INTERE$T

CAPTAIN CONFLICT

CONFLICT?

NAAAAAAA!

ME NO SEE CONFLICT.

 

Actual conflict, is not just a possibility of conflict, ‘through a factual showing on the record.’ ” Moore, 159 F.3d at 1157 (citing Morris v. California, 966 F.2d 448, 455 (9th Cir. 1991)); see also United States v. Shwayder, 312 F.3d 1109, 1117-20 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that the defendant must show that “counsel was influenced in his basic strategic decisions” by the conflict of interest); United States v. Baker, 256 F.3d 855, 860 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that an “attorney has an actual, as opposed to a potential, conflict of interest when, during the course of the representation, the attorney’s and the defendant’s interests diverge with respect to a material factual or legal issue or to a course of action”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

That's a fact!

VENTING

"IN FACT, IN THE MIDST OF THESE CONVERSATIONS OR COMMENTS THAT WERE BEING PUT ON THE COMPUTER, MR. SUTCLIFFE HIMSELF GOT SCARED, GOT SCARED OF GLOBAL [CROSSING] COMPANY. AND HE REMOVED FROM LOS ANGELES AND TOOK HIMSELF ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO NEW HAMPSHIRE TO GET AWAY FROM THEM.

THIS IS WHAT HIS CONDUCT WAS. HIS CONDUCT WAS NOT TO GO FIND THEM.

HIS CONDUCT WAS NOT TO GO THREATEN THEM PERSONALLY BUT TO REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THE SITUATION.

I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FACT THAT HE WAS MAKING THESE STATEMENTS AS HE WAS LEAVING TO GET AS FAR AWAY FROM THESE PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE, THAT HE IS NOT ACTUALLY POSING A REAL THREAT TO ANYONE. HE'S SIMPLY VENTING AND VOICING HIS FEELING OF BEING UPSET.

AND THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN A PHYSICAL THREAT OF VIOLENCE. AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE WHOLE CONTEXT, THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU HAVE HERE."

BESIDE THE LAW SAYS NO MEANS NO. ASK ANY RAPE VICTIM.

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.