FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Los Angeles, California
Monday, August 27, 2003

Killercop: "A finding of competency is one of a fact, not law. United States -v- Shepard, 538 F.2d 107 at 110; United States -v- Fratus -- F-r-a-t-u-s -- 530 F.2d 644 at page 647; U.S. -v- Winn, 577 F.2d 86 at note 14 on page 88; Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, annotations at paragraph 8 on page 2083.

Rule 43, which you used to explain my absence obviously does not apply. And since a finding of incompetence is one of clearly a fact, not law -- And under the right of due process afforded to an accused in a court, the court could not abridge that right by that rule. Pursuant to Title 18, section 2072 (b), 'no rule shall abridge, modify or enlarge a substantive right. 'Rights trump rules.

Further, this court never found me incompetent at the March 14th hearing, so the hearing on April 7th should have been conducted pursuant to the protections afforded to an accused under the Fifth Amendment, due process, and the Sixth Amendment..."


 

Alex Kozinski Hugging Howard Matz

More than 230 participants attended the 18th Annual National Jewish Law Students Association Conference held February at USC. L to R: Alissa Malzman ’06, Melissa Balaban ’91, Julie Marder (Michigan), Judge Stephen Reinhardt, Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge A. Howard Matz, Sam Yebri ’06, Tanya Bayeva (Michigan), conference participant,
Rachel Feldman ’06, Rachel
Weinstein ’06 and Debbie Ghodsian ’06.

he speaketh of his own

 

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

 

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL THAT EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

EPIC CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right.

Do you understand?

NO?

ARE YOU STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

FAQ 1 FAQ 2

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

DEPARTMENT OF JIHAD?

Readers, before everyone who took part in the secret hearing, with malice aforethought, dies, can someone tell me how all three, seasoned attorneys in the story got this rule wrong, and violated every law in the Ninth Circuit, and Supreme Court precedent, going back 20 or more years, as well as the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States?

Can any of you answer that for me?

These three got it right, 4241 comes before 4244. Just like A comes before D.

Examination comes BEFORE treatment. But they all new that. Instead they played stupid.

HOW JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ COVERED UP HIS INCOMPETENCE, AND BROKE THE LAW, AGAIN.

A.K.A. A FACT IN THE LAW. X3

goblin

Court: “Okay. I arranged this status conference because I had some questions about the 'joint proposed amended order' that was lodged last week under Rule 43.

(Joint proposed amended order means all agree to the cover up "he arranged," of the violation of the Due Process Clause and rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendment, as well as Rule 43.)

 

EVIL JUDGE MATZ SAYS...

Killercop's presence is not necessary, given that he’s currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen.

 

This is primarily an issue, at the very least, a mixed issue of fact and law, probably a legal issue.” Page 4, Lines 4-7

 

WRONG, AGAIN, JUDGE MATZ!!!

A WISE GUY

Rule 43(a), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides in part that a defendant must be present at every trial stage, including the jury impanelment and the return of the verdict and sentencing, unless otherwise provided by the rules.

Rule 43(b)(3), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides in part that a defendant need not be present where the “proceeding involves "only" a conference or hearing on a question of law.”

SOURCE: A Manual on Jury Trial Procedures
Prepared by the Jury Instructions Committee
of the Ninth Circuit

Members:
Judge George H. King, Chair
Judge Roger L. Hunt
Judge Lawrence K. Karlton
Judge A. Howard Matz
Judge Jeffrey T. Miller
Judge Marsha J. Pechman
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks

The court’s determination of competency is a >factual, rather than legal, determination.
United States v. Makovich, 209 F.3d 1227, 1232 (10th Cir. 2000).

 

But Judge Matz knew that...he went to Harvard, Law School, they all knew it.

The rule and the law is clear. They were all experts in the law, but not with computers.

Matz must have missed that Harvard law class on the Sixth Amendment, too, 'cause he sure didn't follow it. And that's a fact! Instead he purposely "mixed" it up.


IS POSSESION 9/10ths OF DA LAW?

YOU BETCHA!

YOU BETCHA!

“Facts are many, but the truth is one"

IM MAD YOU KNOW

All societies judge some people mad: any strict clinical justification aside, it is part of the business of marking out the different, deviant, and perhaps dangerous. Such ‘stigma’, according to the American sociologist Erving Goffman, is ‘the situation of the individual who is disqualified from full social acceptance’.

Stigmatizing—the creation of spoiled identity—involves projecting onto an individual or group judgements as to what is inferior, repugnant, or disgraceful. It may thus translate disgust into the disgusting and fears into the fearful, first by singling out difference, next by calling it inferiority, and finally by blaming ‘victims’ for their otherness.

demon

This demonizing process may be regarded as psychologically and anthropologically driven, arising out of deep-seated and perhaps unconscious needs to order the world by demarcating self from other, as in the
polarized distinctions we draw between Insiders and Outsiders, Black and White, Natives and Foreigners, Gay and Straight, Pure and Polluted, and so forth.

The construction of such ‘them-and-us’ oppositions reinforces our fragile sense of self-identity and selfworth through the pathologization of pariahs.

Setting the sick apart sustains the fantasy that we are whole. Disease diagnosis thus constitutes a powerful classificatory tool, and medicine contributes its fair share to the stigmatizing enterprise.

Amongst those scapegoated and anathematized by means of this cognitive apartheid, the ‘insane’ have, of course, been conspicuous. This polarizing of the sane and the crazy in turn spurred and legitimized the institutionalizing trend which gathered momentum from the seventeenth century.

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.