CALLING ALL WITNESSES! COME WATCH AN OFFICIAL GOVERNMNET LYNCHING!!

NO BUDDIES ALLOWED. NO ASSOCIATES AND FRIENDS. NOR ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR THE ACCUSED. IT IS FOR HIS BEST INTEREST!
"JUST A GOOD OL' BOY STYLE LYNCHING!! BUT DON'T WORRY, WE'LL READ HIM THE LAW, AFTER WE HANG 'EM, OF COURSE!! FOR THE TREASON."

GARY, WELCOME TO MY WILD, WILD WEST SHOW!
I GUESS YOU CAN'T GIVE ME MY CERTIFICATE OF RESTORATION, BUT I WILL GIT MY RIGHT O' THE CONFRONTATION... SEEING AS I AM NOW ARMED, AGAIN! BUT WITH EVEN BIGGER NUMBERS THIS TIME. AND I'M NOT TALKING A 38 OR A 44., IF YOU UNDERSTAND?
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
2023 HIT LIST
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
JURY INSTRUCTIONS A.K.A. THE CASE OF THE TRIAL OF AHM
Those of you who are picked to serve as jurors, I will
tell you what you must do.
The standard of proof is beyond
a reasonable doubt. And all of the jurors unanimously have to
agree that the Killercop met that burden of proof.
This presumption isn't a fiction. Right now, as we
are about to begin this process of picking a jury and starting
this trial, A. Howard Matz, as to these charges, is an innocent
man.
It will be up to the jury, those of you who are hand-picked to serve, to determine whether the evidence that the Killercop
introduces establishes that, in fact, he committed these crimes, inter alia.
Is
there anyone who thinks that she or he cannot fairly apply that
burden of proof to the defendant in this case?
If so, please raise your hand.
Okay. I'm going to state on the record now that no
prospective juror has raised her hand or his hand. Yes, you sir, you have a question?
CALL THE FIRST WITNESS!
CALLING DOCTOR WHO! IS HE IN THE ROOM??? NO???
THAT'S OKAY, HIS PRESENCE AND HIS CERTIFICATE, REQUIRED UNDER THE LAW, IS NOT REQUIRED, OR NECESSARY, FOR THIS TRIAL.
BRING FORTH THE FIRST EXHIBIT!!
YUP! HE'S GOT IT!!
NEXT WITNESS!!!
A FLAPDOODLE
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.


MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.
|  |