 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
CALLING ALL WITNESSES! COME WATCH AN OFFICIAL GOVERNMNET LYNCHING!!
NO BUDDIES ALLOWED. NO ASSOCIATES AND FRIENDS. NOR ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR THE ACCUSED. IT IS FOR HIS BEST INTEREST! "JUST A GOOD OL' BOY STYLE LYNCHING!! BUT DON'T WORRY, WE'LL READ HIM THE LAW, AFTER WE HANG 'EM, OF COURSE!! FOR THE TREASON."
GARY, WELCOME TO MY WILD, WILD WEST SHOW! I GUESS YOU CAN'T GIVE ME MY CERTIFICATE OF RESTORATION, BUT I WILL GIT MY RIGHT O' THE CONFRONTATION... SEEING AS I AM NOW ARMED, AGAIN! BUT WITH EVEN BIGGER NUMBERS THIS TIME. AND I'M NOT TALKING A 38 OR A 44., IF YOU UNDERSTAND?
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
JURY INSTRUCTIONS A.K.A. THE CASE OF THE TRIAL OF AHM Those of you who are picked to serve as jurors, I will tell you what you must do. The standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. And all of the jurors unanimously have to agree that the Killercop met that burden of proof. This presumption isn't a fiction. Right now, as we are about to begin this process of picking a jury and starting this trial, A. Howard Matz, as to these charges, is an innocent man. It will be up to the jury, those of you who are hand-picked to serve, to determine whether the evidence that the Killercop introduces establishes that, in fact, he committed these crimes, inter alia. Is there anyone who thinks that she or he cannot fairly apply that burden of proof to the defendant in this case? If so, please raise your hand. Okay. I'm going to state on the record now that no prospective juror has raised her hand or his hand. Yes, you sir, you have a question? CALL THE FIRST WITNESS! CALLING DOCTOR WHO! IS HE IN THE ROOM??? NO??? THAT'S OKAY, HIS PRESENCE AND HIS CERTIFICATE, REQUIRED UNDER THE LAW, IS NOT REQUIRED, OR NECESSARY, FOR THIS TRIAL. BRING FORTH THE FIRST EXHIBIT!! YUP! HE'S GOT IT!!
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
