 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
Behind every investigation lies a story, behind every trial lies the truth.THE ORAL FALSE CONFESSION AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE.
I certainly never told Sung Park I transferred anything. As in nothing. By the way, anyone seen an expert? If so, please have him examine our LOGS
Judge Alex Kozinski seems to believe mysterious things happen with the internet, like "accidental facts" routed just to his tiny wizard mind, to give him jurisdiction where he has no facts, other than a false confession. He was able to extract this ‘sudden confession of guilt’ only after he spoon- feeds the words to make his false record. He had to get around the fact that the government's burden is they must prove I transmitted, not just assume it. Which they failed to do, false confession notwithstanding. The same fact applies to the claim that I "insisted on firing" all 6 attorneys when "clearly" they quit and I begged the court to not let the Public Defenders quit. His allowing them to "recuse their entire district" from representing Killercop, and the lie above, let the "true" torture begin. Enter William Harris, appointed by the same Public Defenders Office that just recused themselves, to take over their "complex, criminal computer case." "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
He "Sung" Like A Bird. The Conflicted FPD'S So Called "Appeal" Of Sung Park, ESQUIRE. Meet the government's "re-presenter," AKA the Public Pretender, who is but one of many forced on the accused. Right after his fraudulent and false confession to the Ninth Circuit, he quit, in the parking lot, and went to work for Rob Bonner, Judge A. Howard Matz's good friend. How you like those rotten apples?
Since Sung Park, Esquire, one of several rampant attorneys at large, and almost the last of many conflicted ones, forced by the Ninth Circuit; currently employed by Rob Bonner of Homeland Security, the day after the appeal, (think about that one for a moment) knew for a fact that the accused never would, or did, admit transmitting anything against the law; and nor did the government ever prove he did transmit anything against the law, why would he falsely confess that the accused was guilty of transmitting anything when he knew the government had no proof.
Or why would the appeals court judge Alex Kozinski, force-feed him more lies, and he admit to those spoon-fed lies, knowing they were lies he could never prove.
Examine some of the players, then play connect the dots... You might find violations of the rights under the Bill of Rights, euphemistically labeled technical errors.
Rights are now called "entitlements." That way, a technical error of an entitlement is not the same as a flagrant violation of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution they swore to uphold, defend, protect and serve.
Especially when they know the burden of the requirements of the law. To wit, a "transfer across state lines."
No transfer across state lines means no jurisdiction.
So they ignore the laws of MAC, the NIC and IP.
Makes no sense. As in none, zero, zip, zilch, nada.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
