 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Killercop: “As this court advised at the last hearing, it would need at least a half an hour just to describe the dangers of my even considering to represent myself against the vast strength, wealth, and weight of the United States Government. I agree that self-representation is not appropriate and I appreciate the counsel from Your Honor.” Page 18, Line 7-10. Defendant: “I would therefore request respectfully this court order the Public Defender’s Office to be prepared to try the case on October 22, [2002] as so ordered and to deny any motion to be relieved.”
L.A. District Judge A. Howard Matz raised a more abstract concern when he said that using BlackBerrys inhibited his efforts to “preserve something akin to the majesty of the law.”
FORGET THE DOWNTRODDEN AND HELPLESS OTHER AMERICANS.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
The Following Takes Place On Thursday, October 11, 2007. A.K.A. The hit and Run.
U.S. v. Sutcliffe (9th Cir. - Oct. 11, 2007) "Yikes! Want to read a creepy story about a "dangerously threatening" geek? Then read the first four pages of this opinion. Nasty.
Funny line by the district court, which sentenced Killercop to the top end of the guidelines range. Judge Matz tells Killercop: "If there were a crime . . . that consisted of arrogance, I would depart upward to sentence you to a much longer sentence." Never something you want to hear your judge say at sentencing, I imagine. Posted by Shaun Martin at 11:08 AM
HEY SHAUN! I AM A NERD, NOT A GEEK! GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. EVER SEEN A FALSE CONFESSION? I HAVE. NOW THAT IS DANGEROUS. I THINK YOU ARE A DANGEROUS DORK STALKER.
Factually, Shaun, you have no idea. So you must be an attorney, and not a lawyer. A lawyer doesn't "guess" at the law before he applies the law, he knows the law and THEN applies it.
Next time just ask me before you talk about me. I'm fun! Matz is the one who is not fun. And he is, how you say, "pretty" much insane? Personally, I think he is very much insane. But I'm no Doctor. PS: The correct adjective is scary, not nasty.
While the public loves to bash lawyers, judges, and politicians, law professors have escaped all blame. Read the inside story of how progressive political ideology became the reigning orthodoxy of elite legal education, providing the legal theories responsible for an overweening government committed to mandating, prohibiting, or regulating every aspect of American life in the "public interest." I wish I could say I exaggerate but, sadly, the legal foundation of the road to serfdom was devised by law professors, like Shaun. Care to debate?
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
