AN INVITATION TO STEAL???
DO YOU DARE TO CONSTRUE IT TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION? HAVE YOU SEEN IT? HAVE YOU HEARD IT?

AN INVITATION TO STEAL???
OKAY, IF YOU SAY SO. I DISAGREE.
BUT, SINCE YOU ARE MY CAPTIVES, HERE IS ONE FREE SS NUMBER A DAY SINCE YOU "HAVE TO" STEAL, WHILE YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT YOURSELF AND YOUR HOUSE AND LISTEN TO SOUND WAVE FILES!
ME?
I THINK YOU ARE INCOMPETENT IF YOU HAVE TO LOOK AND HAVE TO LISTEN.

BUT I I CAN'T LOOK OR LISTEN! IT'S NOT PRUDENT. PROBABLY.
You can start off by stealing the identities of William Cohen, ex-President Clinton's secretary of defense
Maria Elena Lagomasino, Ms. Lagomasino is the Chief Executive Officer of GenSpring Family Offices.
Sir Lod Cook, is a Knight of England.
Camila Parker Bowles, is the wife of the Prince of England.

In killercop.com, like America, you can be anything you want to be! It's possible!! Thanks to Judge A. Howard Matz!! And the Internet. Oh, and some lies by Judge Elena Duarte.
PIP PIP, CHEERIO!!
BUT JUST REMEMBER, THEY WANT TO KEEP THINGS SECRET. SO YOU CAN'T LEARN. OR YOUR CHILDREN.
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
WOUNDED WIKI
WSJ
NY TIMES
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
GOFUNDME
(c)1997-2023 |

CONSTRUED TO THE GENERAL RULE OF THE NORMAL PRINCIPLE, INSTEAD OF TO THE NORMAL RULE OF THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE! RE-FRAME THE QUESTION.
AM I NOT PRETTY CLEAR!!!

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE REASON I'M ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS IS, IS THAT IF I -- IF I WERE TO TELL YOU ------- AND, AGAIN, THIS IS -- I GUESS HAS TO BE A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION --BUT IF A JUDGE HAD A MENTAL BREAKDOWN, I DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SAW THIS MORNING.

DIRECTLY FOLLOWED DISCUSSIONS OF HIS PLEADING GUILTY, AND WHAT JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ WOULD HAVE TO DO AND HAVE TO ADMIT TO IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE CASE, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT, PERHAPS, JUDGE MATZ SIMPLY GETS VERY, VERY ANGRY TO THE POINT WHERE HE REFUSES TO CONTROL HIMSELF, AND INSTEAD, EXPRESSES HIS ANGER WHEN HE'S CONFRONTED WITH THE FACT THAT IT'S MAYBE TIME TO EITHER SETTLE THE CASE OR GET READY FOR THE TRIAL?
BUT I THINK THE WAY TO REALLY GET THE QUESTION FRAMED IN A WAY THAT I THINK WOULD ASSIST ME, IS TO ASK IT THIS WAY, OR BETTER YET, THIS WAY.

DOCTOR, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT'S AN INHERENT FUNCTION OF KILLERCOP, IN REPRESENTING EFFECTIVELY THE "BEST" INTEREST OF THE U.S., TO EXPLORE WITH THE US, A REASONABLE PLEA AGREEMENT THAT MIGHT LIMIT SOME "DOWNSIDE RISKS" TO THE JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ; AND, TWO, SECONDLY, TO THE EXTENT THAT I THEN HAVE AN "OBLIGATION" TO DISCUSS WITH HIZZZZ ODOR, THE DISCUSSIONS WE MAY HAVE HAD WITH THE U.S.?
DO YOU THINK THAT THE COMBINATION OF THOSE TWO THINGS WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO TAKE HIM OFF THE BENCH, AND SUBJECT HIM TO SOME TREATMENT?
YOU KNOW, THE KIND WITH THE CONSEQUENCES? DO YOU THINK HE WOULD THEN FOLLOW THE LAW?
DUE YOU?
NOT ME.

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT
CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS.
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
|
 |