FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

The case of the fox is guarding the hen house.

 

ALEX IS LARRY


 

 

 

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

FOX NEWS COMMENT 875(c) VIOLATION

WHOIS

WSJ

NY TIMES HIT PIECE

FOX NEWS HIT PIECE

NBC NEWS HIT PIECE

2023 HIT LIST

(c)1997-2023

All Rights Reserved.

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.

SO, HOW'S THAT FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, cOVER UP, THING WORKING OUT FOR YA?

Seriously?


DUMB AND DUMBER

Under our rules, a judicial misconduct complaint "must contain a concise statement that details the specific facts on which the claim of misconduct or disability is based."
Judicial-Conduct Rule 6(b); see also 28 U.S.C. § 351(a).

The brief statement of facts required by section 351(a) must be prepared specifically for the misconduct proceeding, although it need not follow a particular form. See Judicial-Conduct
Rule 6(a). What matters is that it be concise and set forth the alleged misconduct in a clear and straightforward fashion.

Although complainants may attach exhibits to their complaint, the exhibits must directly support the allegations of misconduct or disability in the statement of facts. Cf. Tenth
Cir. Misconduct Rule 6.2 ("[T]he complainant should take care to include only documentation that is required to support the specific facts alleged[, while excluding e]xcess or irrelevant
documentation . . . .").

In a complaint alleging prejudice or bias, for example, excerpts of a trial transcript in which the judge allegedly covered up racist comments would be appropriate; the entire record would not.

("Rule 6(b) makes clear that the complaint must be more than a suggestion to a Chief Judge that, if he . . . looks hard enough in a particular direction, he might uncover misconduct.").

In conducting an expeditious review pursuant to section 352(a), the chief judge and staff will therefore not examine any documentary materials unless the statement of facts, on its face, presents what appears to be a sufficient allegation of misconduct and specifically
points to the pages in the attachment that support the allegations.

 

A FLAPDOODLE

FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

TWITTER

(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.

Buy Killercop a Coffee

PLEASE DONATE WITH ZELLE

MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.

LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.