While an "Eye for an Eye" would leave America blind, a good poke is sometimes needed.

"I don't avoid confrontation, people should know that." ~Killercop.

"You have free will, use it and go look at yourselves and your houses. I will do the same." ~Killercop

The Architect is just one of a series of works which examine the confrontation of innocence and experience, illustrating the complex ethics of power that exist between reader and writer, critic and artist, the human and the divine.
~John Scott

SPONSORED BY THE LAW OFFICES OF R. SAMUEL PAZ
Buckingham Heights 5701 W. Slauson Avenue Suite 202 Culver City CA 90230 Telephone (310) 410-2981 Facsimile (310) 410-2957 Kenneth N. Flaxman KENNETH N. FLAXMAN P.C. 200 S. Michigan Avenue Suite 1240 Chicago, IL 60604 (312) 427-3200
NATIONAL POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT.

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.

Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS

WSJ

NY TIMES HIT PIECE

FOX NEWS HIT PIECE

NBC NEWS HIT PIECE

2023 HIT LIST

(c)1997-2023

All Rights Reserved.

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.

The Case Of The Left Hook.

A.K.A. Gary has no rights to avoid me.

The constitutional right to cross-examine is
"[s]ubject always to the broad discretion of a trial judge to preclude repetitive and unduly harassing interrogation," but that limitation cannot preclude a defendant from asking, not only "whether [the witness] was biased" but also "to make a record from which to argue why [the witness] might have been biased." 396 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir.2005) (quoting Davis, 415 U.S. at 318) (footnotes omitted) (alterations in original).

We consider three factors "in determining whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause right to cross-examine is violated:

(1) [whether] the excluded evidence was relevant;

(2)
[whether] there were other interests outweighing the defendant's interest in presenting the evidence; and

(3)
[whether] the exclusion of the evidence left the jury with sufficient information to assess the credibility of the witness." Id. at 1103 (alterations in original) (citing United States v. Beardslee, 197 F.3d 378, 383 (9th Cir. 1999)).

A FLAPDOODLE

FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER

(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.

MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.

LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.