afda.org is unsecure and insecure like it's owner

"In the long history of British criminal jurisprudence, there was only one tribunal that ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." U.S. v Faretta, 422 US 806 (1975)

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.

Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.

Gregory Nicolaysen

Incompetent, Unsecure And Insecure afda.org Extraordinare

Greg is an attorney who goes by the lofty title of "esquire." He likes to hold himself out as an attorney with " extensive experience with computer law, computer usage and computer technology."

“Okay. Mr. Nicolaysen, you were contacted, I think, by the court clerk because of your membership on the CJA panel, and especially because of what I have been informed is your unusually extensive experience with computer law, computer usage and computer technology.” ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz. Transcript of 01.17.2003, Case CR 02-350 AHM

Greg has a law office in California. Well, it's actually a front, and not a real office. (PDF)(3.5 meg)

Greggy even has a website called afda.org. Wanna see what is in it? We can tell ya this much, it's not filled with "computer law, computer usage and computer technology."

It is however filled with other attorneys "personal and private information" like thier credit card numbers, inter alia, which Greggy left unsecured for thieves to steal after he charged these other attornys a fee to enter.

This guy is so retarded he even leaves lots and lots personal pictures of his family there, too. Below is one of a set of dozens stored in an .exe file titled simply, family.exe.

UPDATE: Gregg is changing the site in 2009, to make it more secure after we exposed his holes.

Even though Gregg was appointed by the judge in this case to represent the Sutcliffe at his trial, the Sutcliffe did not want him to represent him, but that didn't slow Greggy or the judge down one bit. He just "forced" himself on the Sutcliffe, and then proceeded to call the Sutcliffe "incompetent."

He then attended a "secret hearing" held by the judge to cover up their own "incompetence. "

Then the judge let him off the hook and made David Reed take his place.

Greg and David Fight

Why? Because Greg hates Christians. Seriously!

SAY WHAT?

01.17.2003

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Okay. Mr. Nicolaysen, you were contacted, I think, by the court clerk because of your membership on the CJA panel, and especially because of what I have been informed is your unusually extensive experience with computer law, computer usage and computer technology."

Accused: "I want to object to these proceedings. I have not authorized this man to speak for me. If anybody in the courtroom thinks they have authority to speak for me I want to see their authority right now."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Mr. Nicolaysen is your lawyer and he's proceeding under the authority of the court."

Accused: "No, he's not my lawyer. He's your lawyer. He's not my lawyer. He's your lawyer. Acknowledge that, sir. You do not speak for me."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "He has no duty to acknowledge that and you have no authority to interfere with that."

Accused: "I have not given you authority to speak for me. Your silence acknowledges that. I object to this whole proceeding. It's a farce."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Your objection is noted."

Accused: "It's a kangaroo court."

Judge A. Howard Matz:"Your objection is noted and denied. Please continue, Mr. Nicolaysen."

SOURCE FILE:

SAY WHAT?

03.14.2003

Accused: "I move at this point, to remove this man as my counsel, as he no longer speaks for me."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Sit down and I'll deal with that motion later. "Okay. Mr. Nicolaysen, do you?""

Accused: "Objection. He does not speak for the Accused."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Your motion --"

Accused: "He does not speak for the accused."

Judge A. Howard Matz: "Be quiet!"

Accused: “I challenge the jurisdiction of this court. This examination is unlawful; and you're holding me unlawfully. You have no honor. You have lost all sense of honor in this courtroom. Kangaroo Court!"

Killercop was thereafter "removed" from the courtroom and placed in another room outside in the hallway. Alone. No video feed from this remote room. No counsel. Deaf, dumb and blinded. While Greg, the prosecutor and the judge all gave testimony against him.

"Mitchell was absent for Smart's testimony. As he has throughout the hearings, he entered the courtroom singing a Mormon hymn and refused to stop when the judge ordered him to. U.S. Marshals removed him from the courtroom and he watched the testimony via a video feed from a remote room.

SOURCE FILE:

SAY WHAT?

04.14.2003

Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen."

Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding that you didn't make; however --"

We bet those attorneys above don't think Greg is such a computer "expert" after they find out he left lots and lots personal pictures and their personal information on his server open to the public, much like this guy Alex Kozinski Who by the way decided the very appeal that decided that what this guy Greg did, above, was ok, and that it was "wrong" to fire Greg.

Seems Greg, and the Judge, and even the prosecutor were more then business associated, they were also close friends. It was a trifecta prosecution. Three against one. Pretty bad odds. That's just this man's perspective.

WOE UNTO THEE...

Can you guess why Yang and Nicolayson were treated like royalty by judge Matz? Or why the Wizard of Koz gave them all a free pass to violate my rights? Here is a big hint for all you detectives, from the Board Of Governors. He was the prosecutors dream team. He lists his Professional Associations as :

American Bar Association (Criminal Justice Section, White Collar Crime Committee; Legislative Affairs Section)

The above is important because the case in discussion was a watershed whitecollar case for the government's Legislative Affairs, since there was no law on the books in the Ninth Circuit regarding jurisdiction of the Internet. So, since the writen law won't fly to silence the Internet speech of American Citizens, so he and they steer this case to create the color of the law.

A FLAPDOODLE

FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT