 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
HMMMM, MAYBE HIS MISSING EXPERTS STOLE THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW?
Judge Matz: "Now [killercop] if you are relying on and if your lawyers are relying on outside experts to assist in any aspect of the defense, and it wouldn't surprise me if they have to, given the nature of these charges." "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
THE CASE OF THE EXPERTS FOR THE DEFENSE: NOT! IT IS ALL ABOUT HIM. ALL THE TIME.
Transcript of 09.26.2003 Page 20 THE COURT: NOW, I DON'T THINK IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR
THE RECORD TO NOTE THAT I'VE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED EXPERTS, OR AT
LEAST ONE EXPERT, I DON'T GO BACK AND CHECK THE FILE BUT AT LEAST
ONE EXPERT, AND I THINK COULD HAVE BEEN MORE THAN ONE, SOMEBODY WITH SPECIFIC SKILL AND ADVANCED SKILL IN COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AS WELL TO BE APPOINTED TO REPRESENT OR ASSISlT
MR. REED: NO. NOT. AT. ALL. YOUR. HONOR.
THE COURT: HAS ANYBODY DISCUSSED WITH YOU ANY OF KILLERCOP'S PRIOR LAWYERS, ANY EXPERT REPORTS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED?
MR. REED: NO. YOUR. HONOR Transcript of 10.21.2002 Page 36, Lines 20-25
Judge Matz: “Now, Mr. Reed, one of the items that Killercop has filed seems to suggest that he has never received any or any witness statements. Among the material that you received from prior counsel that you and Mr. Nicolaysen put together for delivery to MDC, do you recall whether any investigative reports prepared by anybody acting on behalf of Killercop? You don't have to say who did it.”
Reed: “On behalf of Killercop - -“
Judge: “Yeah.”
Reed: “No.”
DID YOU SEE THAT, FOLKS? No. None. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes.
How ya like those apples in a "complex computer case?" You bought 3 reports, 3 of them! Paid for by your tax dollas! Not once, but three times!!! You got ripped off. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
