 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
May a court, consistent with the Confrontation Clause, deprive the accused of his right to compel a witness against him "to submit to cross-examination, the `greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth'"? -Green, 399 U.S. at 158, 90 S.Ct. 1930 (quoting 5 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 1367 (3d ed.1940)).
THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice. Ladies and gentlemen, we all know that anything is possible. The question that calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question. Do I have to reframe your question? Or you'll have to explore that in another stage of the lawsuit, Killercop. Anything is possible. KILLERCOP: Okay. THE COURT: So questions about whether something is possible are not ordinarily appropriate. In fact, they are ordinarily not appropriate."
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Impossible? A.K.A. When Anything is possible then you must be a God. Or nutz! And a no can become a yes.
"IF THE COMPLAINT OR INDICTMENT IN WHICH YOU ARE CHARGED HAS NOT YET BEEN FILED IN THIS COURT, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE FOR ARRIVAL OF PROCESS. IN ADDITION, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF RULE 20 OF FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, WHICH PROVIDES THAT IF YOU WISH TO PLEAD GUILTY OR NO CONTEST, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO DO THAT HERE IN THIS DISTRICT WITHOUT YOUR BEING RETURNED TO THE DISTRICT WHERE THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU WERE FILED. THIS IS SOMETHING FOR YOU TO DISCUSS FURTHER WITH YOUR LAWYER. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT IF YOU ARE CHARGED WITH AN
OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES TO HAVE BAIL DETERMINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BAIL REFORM ACT OF 1984. UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THAT ACT YOU MAY BE DETAINED IN CUSTODY PENDING FURTHER COURT PROCEEDINGS, OR YOU MAY BE RELEASED ON BAIL, OR BY SETTING OTHER CONDITIONS -- OR BY SATISFYING OTHER CONDITIONS SET BY THE COURT.
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
