May a court, consistent with the Confrontation Clause, deprive the accused of his right to compel a witness against him "to submit to cross-examination, the `greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth'"? -Green, 399 U.S. at 158, 90 S.Ct. 1930 (quoting 5 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 1367 (3d ed.1940)).

THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice.

Ladies and gentlemen, we all know that anything is possible.

The question that calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question.

Do I have to reframe your question? Or you'll have to explore that in another stage of the lawsuit, Killercop. Anything is possible.

KILLERCOP: Okay.

THE COURT: So questions about whether something is possible are not ordinarily appropriate. In fact, they are ordinarily not appropriate."

KILLERCOP: What ever are you babbling on about? Fact? Do you ordinarily make up facts? Because I am pretty sure that is not appropriate.

Impossible?

Most Likely.

A.K.A. When Anything is possible then you must be a God. Or nutz! And a no can become a yes.

"IF THE COMPLAINT OR INDICTMENT IN WHICH YOU ARE CHARGED HAS NOT YET BEEN FILED IN THIS COURT, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE FOR ARRIVAL OF PROCESS.

IN ADDITION, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF RULE 20 OF FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, WHICH PROVIDES THAT IF YOU WISH TO PLEAD GUILTY OR NO CONTEST, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO DO THAT HERE IN THIS DISTRICT WITHOUT YOUR BEING RETURNED TO THE DISTRICT WHERE THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU WERE FILED.

THIS IS SOMETHING FOR YOU TO DISCUSS FURTHER WITH YOUR LAWYER.

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT IF YOU ARE CHARGED WITH AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES TO HAVE BAIL DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BAIL REFORM ACT OF 1984.

UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THAT ACT YOU MAY BE DETAINED IN CUSTODY PENDING FURTHER COURT PROCEEDINGS, OR YOU MAY BE RELEASED ON BAIL, OR BY SETTING OTHER CONDITIONS -- OR BY SATISFYING OTHER CONDITIONS SET BY THE COURT.

Or, or, or, or, or

Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)

CONTACT

COLLECT A BOUNTY

COLLECT A REWARD

FILE A COMPLAINT

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved