Welcome To Killercop.com Where Today Only One Student Killed Himself. Sounds Like He Was An Objective Reasonable Listener.


		CONTACT KILLERCOP


Welcome To Killercop.com Where Today Only One Student Killed Himself. Sounds Like He Was An Objective, Reasonable, True Listener. Whether an objective or subjective test is used to determine if a communication constitutes a "true" threat is not settled law in the Ninth Circuit, see United States v. Sutcliffe, 505 F.3d 944, 961-62 (9th Cir.2007) (recognizing conflict in Ninth Circuit case law); United States v. Stewart, 420 F.3d 1007, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2005) (same), although other circuits apply an objective test, see United States v. Davila, 461 F.3d 298, 304-05 (2d Cir.2006); United States v. Koski, 424 F.3d 812, 817 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Fuller, 387 F.3d 643, 646 (7th Cir.2004); United States v. Zavrel, 384 F.3d 130, 136 (3d Cir.2004). "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson REPORT A GANG MEMBER. Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?" WHOIS WSJ 2023 HIT LIST TERMS OF USE DISCLAIMER PRIVACY POLICY (c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE	Court absolves school officials of responsibility in student's suicide One student killed himself. Federal appellate court says Ontario-Montclair School District officials acted appropriately in disciplining four students who skipped school to attend a rally. One student killed himself. By Carol J. Williams June 1, 2009 Ontario-Montclair School District officials acted appropriately in disciplining four students who skipped school to attend an immigration rally, even though one boy was so traumatized by threatened punishments that he committed suicide, a federal appeals court panel ruled Monday. The case brought by the dead boy's parents raised an array of questions about the students' constitutional rights to attend the rally as an act of free expression and the latitude of DeAnza Middle School Vice Principal Gene Bennett in sanctioning the truant protesters. After Bennett lectured the young teenagers, warning that they could go to Juvenile Hall for three years and expose their parents to monetary fines, Anthony Soltero, then a 14-year-old eighth-grader, shot himself to death with his stepfather's rifle. Soltero's parents, Louise Corales and Jamie Soltero, as well as one of the other students, sued the school district, alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress. The four students left school without permission on March 28, 2006, to take part in a protest against impending changes to federal immigration laws. Louise Corales said her son called her shortly before shooting himself to death March 30, saying that he was suspended from school and had been told by Bennett that he was going to jail. U.S. District Court Judge Stephen G. Larson had dismissed the parents' suit in 2007, prompting the appeal to the San Francisco-based U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. While determining the students' action to have been an expression of opinion that could be protected by the 1st Amendment, the three-judge panel said the students were being punished for truancy, not for engaging in protected free speech. The decision exonerated Bennett and another school official, Kathleen Kinley, of responsibility for Soltero's suicide, stating that the tragic occurrence was "unforeseeable and extraordinary" but not the result of negligence or excessive punishment. "Because Bennett's statements could not be interpreted as intended to cause any unlawful injury to the students, they did not constitute a true threat of corporal punishment," the appeals panel said. The parents' attorney, R. Samuel Paz, said he needed to further study the 9th Circuit opinion before advising his clients on whether to appeal. "At this point I just have to deal with the sadness of them and figure out what is the right thing to do from here," Paz said. The opinion was written by Senior Circuit Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, and joined by Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, named to the bench by President Jimmy Carter, and visiting U.S. District Court Judge David Alan Ezra of Hawaii, another Reagan appointee. carol.williams@latimes.com SOURCE: TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023) They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW. NY TIMES HIT PIECE FOX NEWS HIT PIECE NBC NEWS HIT PIECE MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT . THIS SPACE FOR SALE All Rights Reserved.